European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Total intravenous anaesthesia with sufentanil-midazolam for major abdominal surgery.
Haemodynamic and endocrine stress responses were compared during total intravenous anaesthesia with sufentanil and midazolam or fentanyl and midazolam in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Twenty-two ASA I and II patients were allocated randomly to receive sufentanil (induction 1.5 micrograms kg-1 plus infusion 1.5 micrograms kg-1 h-1) or fentanyl (induction 10 micrograms kg-1 plus infusion 10 micrograms kg-1 h-1) supplemented with 0.15 microgram kg-1 sufentanil or 1 microgram kg-1 fentanyl as necessary. Midazolam was infused to obtain plasma concentrations of 500-600 ng ml-1. ⋯ Cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations increased in both groups. Bradycardia occurred in four patients with sufentanil and in three with fentanyl. There were two cases of marked thoracic rigidity with sufentanil and one with fentanyl.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Technical problems and side effects associated with continuous intrathecal or epidural post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
Fifty-five patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia (4 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine) were randomized to receive post-operative analgesia either using an intrathecal or an epidural catheter. Associated technical problems and side effects were studied. In both groups per-operative analgesia was achieved with intrathecal 0.5% plain bupivacaine, 4 ml. ⋯ The number of side effects was 21 in the remaining spinal group (n = 20) and 18 in the 20 epidural group patients with successful infusions. One patient in the spinal catheter group developed postdural puncture headache. For post-operative pain relief the patients in the epidural group needed less supplementary intramuscular oxycodone (five doses/four patients) than the spinal group (17 doses/nine patients) (P < 0.05).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesia for outpatient surgery: placebo versus naproxen sodium (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) given before or after surgery.
One hundred and eighty patients scheduled for day-care surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive naproxen sodium 1100 mg 1 h prior to surgery, naproxen sodium 1100 mg immediately after surgery, or placebo. The pre-surgery naproxen sodium group had significantly lower pain scores 1 h post-operatively and at discharge than the placebo group. At discharge both treatment groups were better than placebo. ⋯ A questionnaire concerning general acceptability of anaesthesia/analgesia showed similar results. Our conclusion is that naproxen is better than placebo for treatment of post-operative pain. The time of administration pre- or post-operatively is important for the immediate post-operative pain, but we found no support for the existence of 'pre-emptive analgesia'.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Preferential channelling of anaesthetic solution injected within the perivascular axillary sheath.
Preferential channelling of anaesthetic solution injected into the perivascular axillary sheath was investigated in 40 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic upper-limb surgery. Three needles, with different approaches and inclinations, were inserted near the three main terminal branches of the brachial plexus using an axillary approach. ⋯ Back flow was observed, mainly in the needle nearest to the radial nerve during injection of the anaesthetic solution in the superior and inferior aspects of the brachial artery, and in the needle close to the ulnar nerve when the injection was performed posterior to the artery, near the radial nerve. These results could be related to the trapping of anaesthetic solution in unconnected compartments and to the slope of the needle injecting the anaesthetic solution which spreads preferentially along a gradient following the needle shaft direction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Double burst stimulation with submaximal current.
The present study evaluated responses to double burst stimulation (DBS) at supramaximal and submaximal currents in 30 adult patients. Usually, DBS is applied with supramaximal stimulation, but this may be quite uncomfortable for the awake patient. Therefore, the authors investigated whether it is possible to obtain an accurate assessment of significant residual neuromuscular blockade if the stimulus current is reduced to 30 mA. ⋯ The relations between control T4/T1 ratios determined by supramaximal TOF stimulation and D2/D1 ratios determined by supramaximal DBS3.3 and submaximal DBS3.3 were Y = 0.99X + 0.08 and Y = 1.01X + 0.04, respectively, and there was no statistical difference between the two regression lines. The same relation between T4/T1 ratios and D2/D1 ratios by DBS3.2 were Y = 0.69X + 0.05 and Y = 0.72X + 0.02, respectively, and there was no significant difference. It is concluded that evaluation of the response to DBS at 30 mA has the same reliability as evaluation with supramaximal current.