Der Unfallchirurg
-
Numerous scoring systems are available for various particular situations. Some clinicians consider scores as mandatory for daily clinical decision making, while others see them only as additional work with no proven benefit except for scientific aspects. Although scoring systems have their limitations, they can also be of value. ⋯ The specific aims of different scoring systems are discussed and evaluated for the areas of disease classification, monitoring of individual patients and applications to individual decisions, quality assurance (comparison of patient groups and therapies), economic evaluation and global triage decisions. Despite the additional workload it is concluded that scoring systems are of proven benefit for classification of the degree of severity of a disease process, quality assurance, and better assessment of costs containment. These instruments will become increasingly important in our current discussion on changes in health care systems.
-
A variety of different scoring systems are in current use, with an increasing impact on intensive care treatment. Originally these scoring systems were applied to evaluate objective grading and to estimate survival and mortality. More recently, other potential applications have been investigated. ⋯ Although desirable, individual patient prediction is therefore not allowed, and therapeutic strategies and therapy evaluation based on scoring systems cannot be implemented, or only in a limited way. For daily use in individual patient evaluation--monitoring, therapy response, prognosis--biochemical monitoring is still of primary importance. Scoring systems have now found a useful application as a supplement, rather than a rival, to clinical patient evaluation.
-
Review
[Management of the patient with craniocerebral injuries at the accident site and clinic admission].
Between January 1991 and December 1992, there were 686 rescue operations involving patients with craniocerebral trauma in the catchment area of Ulm. There were 376 patients who had to be graded as seriously injured according to the NACA classification. In 178 cases there was a severe craniocerebral trauma, and 131 of these patients were admitted to the traumatology department of the University of Ulm. ⋯ Diagnostic procedures and immediate treatment must initially be directed at securing vital functions. Treatment of life-threatening haemorrhage has priority over neurosurgical diagnosis and therapy. The urgent indications for neurosurgical intervention are: space-occupying intracranial bleeding, open craniocerebral traumas, and space-occupying depressed fractures.
-
The mortality rate after traumatic brain injury in children ranges between 2.5% and 21%. Standardized diagnostic procedures and therapeutic strategies for the management of traumatic brain damage are presented in this article. Children with traumatic cerebral lesions have a better clinical outcome than head-injured adults. Optimized medical management and intensive rehabilitation may help to reduce the frequency of mental retardation and physical disability following such injuries in children.
-
Surgical therapy for intracranial extracerebral haemorrhages is one of the oldest surgical techniques. The low mortality and morbidity in recent years have come about through of the emergency service, modern neurosurgical techniques, widespread use of the CT scanner, and adequate intensive care. The treatment target in the case of head injuries is to provide the optimal milieu for recovery from the primary injury and to prevent secondary damage to the brain. ⋯ Twist drill evacuation of the fluid (= chronic haematoma) in local anaesthesia is now accepted as the treatment of choice. An extradural haematoma is a potentially lethal lesion with a mortality rate of 5%. Emergency surgical intervention is appropriate before neurological signs appear.