Der Unfallchirurg
-
The increasing digitalization of social life opens up new possibilities for modern health care. This article describes innovative application possibilities that could help to sustainably improve the treatment of severe injuries in the future with the help of methods such as big data, artificial intelligence, intelligence augmentation, and machine learning. ⋯ In this context, it is a good example of the problem areas such as data transfer, interoperability, standardization of data sets, parameter definitions, and ensuring data protection, which still represent major challenges for the digitization of trauma care. In addition to the further development of new analysis methods, solutions must also continue to be sought to the question of how best to intelligently link the relevant data from the various data sources.
-
Various diseases or groups of diseases can trigger bone marrow edema (BME). The task of the appraiser is to work out the role of a diagnosed BME in the context of the causality based on liability; however, the inconsistent ICD 10 coding of the BME complex also poses a problem, especially for medically untrained insurance clerks. The coding of the BME as a fracture provided by the coding guidelines poses a problem when assessing reserves for damage settlement. Based on the etiology of BME an algorithm is presented that should make it easier for the expert as well as for the insurance clerk in the case of liability and also for the private accident insurance to classify the diagnosis of BME in the case.
-
Minimally invasive stabilization of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures (OF) in neurologically intact patients is well established. Various posterior and anterior surgical techniques are available. The OF classification and OF score are helpful for defining the indications and choice of operative technique. ⋯ Minimally invasive stabilization techniques are safe and effective. The specific indications for the individual procedures are guided by the OF classification and the individual clinical situation of the patient.
-
Nowadays, although minimally invasive procedures are the standard for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries, these techniques are not yet established for the cervical spine. This is due to anatomical and technical reasons and also due to the fact that the classical anterior decompression and fusion procedure already fulfils the criteria of minimally invasiveness and is suitable for the vast majority of injuries. ⋯ There is a minimally invasive variant for nearly all open procedures, mainly in the upper cervical spine but also in the lower cervical spine. The further development of these promising techniques is still pending.
-
Injuries of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common fractures of the spine due to their anatomical position and load. Common classification systems differentiate between stable and unstable injuries and thus also between operative and conservative therapy. The majority of injuries can be treated conservatively; however, unstable injuries require surgical treatment for a variety of reasons. ⋯ Hybrid procedures are also possible. This also applies to the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, since a clear assignment between traumatic and osteoporotic cause is not always easy and possible. This article describes the principles, the possible indications, and limitations of minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization.