Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2006
Multicenter StudyRelative adrenal insufficiency in etomidate-naïve patients with septic shock.
A recent study reported that 77% of patients with septic shock had relative adrenal insufficiency. However, all patients were mechanically ventilated and received high-dose inotropes. In addition, at least 24% had prior exposure to etomidate, a drug known to suppress adrenal function. ⋯ We conclude that the incidence of relative adrenal insufficiency in etomidate-naive septic shock patients was lower than observed in the steroid supplementation trial. Further, in those who fulfilled inclusion criteria for the trial, the incidence of relative adrenal insufficiency was half that reported by the trial. Our observations raise concerns about the generalizability of the findings of the above trial to etomidate-naïve patients.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2006
Comparative StudyA comparison of patient self-administered and investigator-administered measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40.
A 40-item questionnaire (the QoR-40) had been previously developed to measure five dimensions of quality of recovery after anaesthesia and surgery. Each of the 40 items is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a maximum score of 200. In this study we compared patient self-administered with investigator-administered QoR-40. ⋯ The time to complete the questionnaire when investigator-administered was 253 (16) s [mean, (SD)], and on first attempt for patients was 362 (19) s, P<0.001. The QoR-40 is as valid measure of postoperative recovery when administered with the assistance of an investigator as compared with the patient self-administered version. Investigator-administered measurement of the QoR-40 is a more efficient use of resources, as complete and more timely data are collected.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2006
Unplanned admission to the intensive care unit in postoperative patients--an indicator of quality of anaesthetic care?
As a clinical indicator, unplanned admission to the Intensive Care Unit from the operating room has been thought to reflect the quality of anaesthesia care intraoperatively. To explore this concept, we examined all such admissions at three hospitals over a three-month period. Cases were classified according to the Victorian Consultative Council on Anaesthetic Mortality and Morbidity (VCCAMM) classification system and an assessment was made as to whether the admission was inevitable or not. ⋯ These findings suggest that unplanned admission to the Intensive Care Unit from the operating room is not a satisfactory indicator of quality of care by the anaesthesia team. This indicator appears to represent mainly the surgical and medical conditions of the patients, and their complications. Only one in twenty unplanned admissions in this series were potentially avoidable due to complications of the anaesthetic or the postoperative analgesia.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2006
The margin of safety of a left double-lumen tracheobronchial tube depends on the length of the bronchial cuff and tip.
The left tracheobronchial double-lumen tube is the commonest device to separate the left and right lungs for differential ventilation. With the appropriate tube, the left bronchial cuff is positioned in the bronchus so that the cuff is beyond the carina but the tip of the tube does not occlude the aperture of the left upper lobe bronchus. The difference between the length of the left main bronchus and the length of the cuff and tip of the bronchial segment of the tube has been termed "the margin of safety" by Benumof. ⋯ There was also a marked variation in cuff-tip lengths of the same size tube from the same manufacturer. The largest variation was 18 mm for the Portex 41 but substantial variation of 8 mm or more was found in at least one French size of all manufacturers. Users must be aware that significant cuff-tip length variation occurs and match the selected tube to the patient to ensure an adequate margin of safety.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2006
Association of obesity with increased mortality in the critically ill patient.
The impact of obesity on critical care outcomes has been an issue for debate in the literature. Variable data and conflicting results have been reported. The purpose of our study is to examine the impact of obesity on the outcome of patients admitted to a tertiary closed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Saudi Arabia. ⋯ In conclusion, mortality of obese critically ill patients was not higher than patients with normal weight. In fact, the hospital mortality was lower for patients with BMI >40 kg/m2 compared to the normal BMI group despite similar severity of illness. Obesity might have a protective effect, although further studies are needed to substantiate this finding.