Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of pre-incision skin infiltration on post-hysterectomy pain--a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
In this double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial, we compared the analgesic effect of preoperative 0.25% bupivacaine (n = 21) skin infiltration with normal saline (n = 19) in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy through a lower midline incision. All patients received postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and were followed for 72 hours. The main outcome measures were morphine consumption and pain score at rest, and the contribution of different components of pain was also assessed prospectively. ⋯ Visceral pain predominated in the first 48 hours. We concluded that local anaesthetic infiltration is not effective in reducing pain after abdominal hysterectomy. Effective postoperative analgesia should aim to eliminate the visceral pain component.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of adding fentanyl to ropivacaine 0.125% on patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour.
The use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labour analgesia is rapidly gaining acceptance. However, the ideal PCEA solution and PCEA program remains uncertain. We studied the effect of adding fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml on demand-only PCEA using ropivacaine 0.125% for labour analgesia. ⋯ The ratio of successful PCEA demand to total number of demands, the satisfaction score and the maternal-fetal outcome were similar in both groups. In conclusion, the addition of fentanyl had a dose-sparing effect on the requirement of ropivacaine. This PCEA regimen produced a low incidence of motor block, good labour pain relief and excellent patient satisfaction.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostoperative sore throat and hoarseness following tracheal intubation using air or saline to inflate the cuff--a randomized controlled trial.
Sore throat and hoarseness following tracheal intubation is common. The aetiology may include high tracheal cuff pressures. We performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 126 intubated patients to compare the incidence and severity of sore throat and hoarseness following inflation of the cuff using air or saline. ⋯ There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (air 15.9%, saline 14.5%). In the air group mean intra-cuff pressure increased significantly (start 14.0 mmHg, end 40.9 mmHg), while in the saline group there was no significant increase (start 12.7 mmHg, end 14.6 mmHg). The substitution of saline reliably results in sustained low intra-cuff pressures but high tracheal cuff pressure is not an important factor in the development of sore throat or hoarseness postoperatively within the pressure range and duration of operation studied.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of bolus dose of remifentanil on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation.
A randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded study was conducted in 40 ASA 1 and 2 patients to determine the dose response of remifentanil in attenuating the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Patients were allocated to one of four groups: placebo, remifentanil 1 microgram.kg-1, remifentanil 2 micrograms.kg-1 and remifentanil 4 micrograms.kg-1. A propofol target-controlled infusion was started at 4 micrograms.ml-1 and incrementally titrated to loss of verbal contact. ⋯ Systolic blood pressure following intubation increased by 30% in the placebo group, 10% in the 1 microgram.kg-1 group and remained unchanged in the 2 micrograms.kg-1 and 4 micrograms.kg-1 groups. Remifentanil 1 microgram.kg-1 attenuated the rise in heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Remifentanil 2 micrograms.kg-1 blocked the haemodynamic response completely: no further benefit was shown from increasing the dose to 4 micrograms.kg-1.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPre-emptive analgesia with epidural morphine or morphine and bupivacaine.
Studies of preemptive analgesia in humans have shown conflicting results. The study design, patient population and the duration of assessment of postoperative pain are important in the evaluation of preemptive analgesia. We carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study in 80 patients of physical status ASA 1-3 undergoing upper abdominal and thoracic surgery. ⋯ Pre MB compared to Pre M had significantly decreased total postoperative morphine requirements (P < 0.0001) and number of top-ups (P < 0.0001). Epidural morphine plus bupivacaine is effective as a preemptive analgesic. Morphine plus bupivacaine has better efficacy than morphine given alone before the induction of anaesthesia.