Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of subcutaneous ring block of the penis with caudal epidural block for post-circumcision analgesia in children.
A randomized, prospective, blind trial was conducted comparing caudal epidural blockade (caudal block) with subcutaneous ring block of the penis (penile ring block) in fifty healthy boys between two and twelve years of age undergoing elective circumcision. Subjects receiving caudal block had a longer duration of analgesia (P = 0.003), and took longer to first micturition (P = 0.04) but there was no difference in time taken to awaken from anaesthesia or spontaneously walk unaided. ⋯ It is concluded that both techniques are effective. Caudal block is more reliable and produces a longer duration of analgesia but penile ring block is inherently safer and has a lower incidence of adverse effects.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Apr 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntubation without muscle relaxant: an alternative technique for rapid tracheal intubation.
The quality of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with propofol augmented by alfentanil was investigated as an alternative technique for rapid tracheal intubation. 119 patients aged between 18 and 60 years (ASA 1 and 2) undergoing elective surgery were prospectively studied in a randomized double-blind controlled fashion. Tracheal intubation facilitated by suxamethonium 1.0 mg/kg alfentanil 15 mu g/kg alfentanil 30 mu g/kg or saline control was compared after propofol induction. The quality of laryngoscopy and intubation were graded according to jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing on intubation. ⋯ Alfentanil 15 mu g/kg was not statistically significantly different from saline (P = 0.112). Alfentanil 30 mu g/kg provided similar overall intubating conditions (P = 0.5) to suxamethonium 1.0 mg/kg. Alfentanil in both dosages effectively attenuated the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Apr 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the efficacy of ketorolac and indomethacin for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery in day patients.
The analgesia provided in the postoperative period by three regimens commonly used in our private anaesthetic practice were compared in a double-blind study of one hundred and thirty-seven women presenting for day-case laparoscopic procedures. After random allocation into three groups, all patients were similarly anaesthetized and then received both a rectal suppository and an IM injection. Group P received two placebos, Group I had an indomethacin suppository 100 mg and Group K an IM injection of ketorolac 30 mg. ⋯ The parenterally administered ketorolac may be a useful analgesic supplement in these patients. However the trial was aborted following the appearance in the literature of case reports of postoperative renal failure. Further investigation of the efficacy and side-effect profile of reduced doses may be warranted.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Feb 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPatient-controlled epidural analgesia following caesarean delivery: a comparison of pethidine and fentanyl.
Pethidine and fentanyl have both been used to provide patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) following caesarean delivery. Both have been compared with epidural morphine but these drugs have not been compared with each other. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was used in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial to compare fentanyl and pethidine for postoperative epidural analgesia in women having elective caesarean deliveries. ⋯ Results from 45 patients showed no difference in pain level outcomes, but pethidine scored better in all side-effects except for drowsiness at 48 hours. Patients were more satisfied with pethidine (P = 0.015) and overall 65% of patients preferred pethidine. We conclude that pethidine is a suitable drug for patient-controlled epidural analgesia and leads to greater patient satisfaction than does fentanyl.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Feb 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAnalgesia for acute musculoskeletal trauma: low-dose subcutaneous infusion of ketamine.
Low-dose ketamine by subcutaneous infusion (0.1 mg/kg/h) was compared in double-blind fashion with intermittent morphine (0.1 mg/kg intravenously, four-hourly) as analgesic regimen in 40 ASA-I adults after acute musculoskeletal trauma. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scales and sedation was graded on a four point rank drowsiness score. Objective cardiovascular and respiratory parameters and patient acceptability in terms of supplementary analgesia and early mobilization were also recorded. ⋯ None of the patients in ketamine group required supplementary analgesia (P < 0.001) and the patients could be easily mobilized for traction/splintage as compared with patients in the control group (P < 0.001). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the morphine group was high (P < 0.01). The study shows that subcutaneous infusion of ketamine provides safe and effective analgesia in acute musculoskeletal trauma.