Current medical research and opinion
-
Adhering to prescribed medication is often a problem for patients with diabetes yet there is no consensus on how best to measure adherence in this patient population. This systematic literature review critically reviewed and summarized the methods used to measure medication adherence in patients with diabetes (on oral hypoglycemic agents [OHAs] and/or insulin) in original research published between 2007-2013. ⋯ No gold standard exists for measuring medication adherence in patients with diabetes. The plethora of adherence methods precludes the comparison of adherence rates across studies. Greater consistency is therefore needed in adherence measurement, including question content, recall period, and response options for self-report measures. Novel methods for understanding adherence to variable-dosed insulin require further research. Researchers should select a methodology that best fits their research question, study design, patient population and resources.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomized dose-finding study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of albiglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
To investigate the optimal dosage/regimen and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albiglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ⋯ Albiglutide exhibited therapeutic hypoglycemic effects with good tolerability among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; the 30 mg weekly dose was the most efficacious in this study. The 16 week duration of the study prevents generalizing these conclusions to longer treatment periods.
-
Asthma remains a formidable public health problem with ever increasing annual costs and prevalence. There are 300 million people with asthma worldwide. Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are over 25 million Americans with asthma (both children and adults), i.e. one in 12 people have asthma, and this is increasing annually. ⋯ Therefore, we need novel and innovative therapies for asthma. In this Editorial, I review results from a study by Tse et al. evaluating the therapeutic potential of statins, within the context of our current state of knowledge. I review observational studies and clinical trials, highlight some potential pitfalls in clinical trial design, and discuss important questions for future research.
-
Smoking is one of the major risk factors causing morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer patients. Use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy is an effective way to help quit smoking. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of smoking and the proportion of patients using smoking cessation agents, and to identify the socio-demographic factors that affect the use of these agents among COPD and lung cancer patients. ⋯ Results showed that a large number of patients continued to smoke even after the diagnosis of COPD and lung cancer; whereas only a few among them used smoking cessation agents. Ethnicity disparities and insurance status were associated with the use of smoking cessation agents. Differential use among population sub-groups suggests a requirement for need based smoking cessation programs and appropriate prescription drug coverage. Further research needs to be done to evaluate reasons for disparities in smoking cessation agents' use. The study had limitations common to research designs based on observational and self-reported datasets.