Current medical research and opinion
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Efficacy of a triple antiemetic regimen with aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: effects of gender, age, and region.
To determine the variability in treatment responses to antiemetic therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone vs ondansetron and dexamethasone plus aprepitant) given with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. ⋯ Although we acknowledge that subset numbers in this post hoc analysis may be too small to allow definitive conclusions, the data suggest that aprepitant triple therapy provides a benefit over control therapy for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC)- or non-AC-based moderately emetogenic chemotherapy across age, gender, and region. (Original trial results available at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00337727.).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Etoricoxib in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea in Chinese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Assess the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 120 mg compared with ibuprofen 600 mg qid in the treatment of moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea in Chinese women. ⋯ The primary objective of the study was met, demonstrating that etoricoxib 120 mg qd was non-inferior to ibuprofen 600 mg qid; further, etoricoxib was statistically superior to ibuprofen 600 mg qid according to the primary endpoint (TOPAR6) and patient global assessments of study medication. Etoricoxib and ibuprofen were generally well tolerated.
-
Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on serum electrolytes were evaluated using pooled data from studies of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). ⋯ In patients with T2DM, canagliflozin was generally associated with small mean percent changes in serum electrolytes. Infrequent episodes of potassium elevation occurred with canagliflozin 300 mg, but occurred more often in patients with reduced eGFR.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Observational Study
Comparative effectiveness of vildagliptin in combination with other oral anti-diabetes agents in usual-care conditions: the EDGE-Latin America study.
To assess the proportion of patients on vildagliptin add-on dual therapy who respond to treatment over a 12 month follow-up, relative to comparator oral anti-diabetes dual therapy, in a usual care setting. ⋯ In a usual care setting, patients treated with a vildagliptin combination succeeded in lowering A1c to <7%, without weight gain, hypoglycemia or peripheral edema more often than patients treated with comparator combinations, without increased risk of adverse events. Key limitations are the observational nature of the study and its relatively limited 12 month timeframe.
-
The management of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves two choices: (1) rate control versus rhythm control, and (2) anticoagulation treatment based upon risk of stroke. The objective of the study was to describe practice patterns in both of these treatment areas in patients with newly diagnosed AF among a commercially insured population. ⋯ Debate continues regarding whether the preferred management of most patients with AF is through rate control or restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Our retrospective study found that treatments to restore normal heart rhythm, including LACA, which could be considered aggressive initial treatment, were typically reserved as second- or third-line alternatives. Initial standard of care for the majority patients was beta blockers. Though use of anticoagulation may be higher than other observational studies, opportunities exist to increase treatment in high risk patients.