Journal of critical care
-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2012
Clinical TrialChronic heart failure modifies the response to positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Potentially beneficial effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) must be balanced against further overinflation and increased alveolar dead space. Concurrent chronic heart failure (CHF) is common and can lead to changes in lung that can reduce the detrimental effects of PEEP. ⋯ In subjects with severe COPD alone, caution must be used when administering PEEP 10 cm H(2)O or greater. Subjects with COPD + CHF may benefit from higher levels of PEEP.
-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2012
Prediction of pulmonary edema by plasma protein levels in patients with sepsis.
The difficulties of fluid therapy in patients with septic shock are to maintain sufficient vascular volume while preventing pulmonary edema formation. Thus, it is important to find a biomarker that can reliably predict pulmonary edema formation after fluid loading. We evaluated the association of plasma protein levels with the increase in extravascular lung water index (ΔEVLWI) after fluid loading. ⋯ Plasma transferrin and albumin levels were associated with ΔEVLWI 10% or higher after fluid loading. The high sensitivity of both biomarkers indicated that patients with normal values were less likely to develop pulmonary edema after fluid loading.
-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2012
Randomized Controlled TrialEnd-expiratory lung volume recovers more slowly after closed endotracheal suctioning than after open suctioning: a randomized crossover study.
Endotracheal suctioning causes significant lung derecruitment. Closed suction (CS) minimizes lung volume loss during suction, and therefore, volumes are presumed to recover more quickly postsuctioning. Conflicting evidence exists regarding this. We examined the effects of open suction (OS) and CS on lung volume loss during suctioning, and recovery of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) up to 30 minutes postsuction. ⋯ Closed suctioning minimized lung volume loss during suctioning but, counterintuitively, resulted in slower recovery of EELV postsuction compared with OS. Therefore, the use of CS cannot be assumed to be protective of lung volumes postsuctioning. Consideration should be given to restoring EELV after either suction method via a recruitment maneuver.