Archivos de bronconeumología
-
Arch. Bronconeumol. · Mar 2005
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Bronchodilator efficacy of combined salmeterol and tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
Bronchodilators are still the most effective drugs for controlling the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium bromide, a long-acting anticholinergic drug, has recently been added to the therapeutic arsenal for the disease. To date, there have been no studies combining 2 long-acting bronchodilators. The aim of the present trial was to determine whether the combination of salmeterol and tiotropium improved lung function in COPD patients more than either of them alone. ⋯ In terms of improvement in lung function, the combination of salmeterol and tiotropium together with fluticasone is more effective in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD than either of the 2 bronchodilators administered alone.
-
Arch. Bronconeumol. · Jan 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Non-invasive ventilation in kyphoscoliosis. A comparison of a volumetric ventilator and a BIPAP support pressure device].
Non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) at home is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency secondary to severe kyphoscoliosis. Our aim was to compare clinical course, blood gases and lung function after one month of domiciliary NIPPV with two types of ventilator and to assess sleep pattern changes in patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized crossover study. Ten patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency due to kyphoscoliosis were enrolled and randomly assigned to the first device. ⋯ All but one patient had better tolerance of the bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP) support mode than of the volumetric ventilator. Our study shows that NIPPV is equally effective for patients with kyphoscoliosis whether administered with a volumetric ventilator or a BIPAP device. Subjective response and tolerance seem to be slightly better with BIPAP.
-
Arch. Bronconeumol. · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparative evaluation of 3 types of syringes routinely used for arterial gas analysis].
This prospective study evaluates the practical utility of a special plastic syringe for collecting arterial blood samples for gasometry, comparing it to a glass syringe and a conventional plastic one, in 120 patients who came to our hospital for arterial blood analysis for a variety of reasons. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups according to type of syringe assigned. Technicians with experience in the technique prepared the syringes and collected the arterial blood samples after providing local anesthesia. ⋯ There were no differences in level of pain reported (on an analog scale) and the subjective quality of the radial pulse wave was good and similar in all three groups. In conclusion, these results show that use of the special syringe offers no important practical advantages for experienced technicians that would justify the higher price. In fact, as the conventional plastic syringes are cheaper, disposable and similarly effective in expert hands, our results suggest that their routine use for collecting arterial blood gas samples can help improve the cost-benefit ratio for a common procedure in pulmonary function units.