Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section, of epidural opioids and patient-controlled analgesia after Caesarean section, and of epidural and other forms of analgesia in labour. A mail survey was sent to the "Head Nurse, Department of Obstetrics" at each of the 142 hospitals in Ontario with designated obstetric beds. Responses were obtained from 100% of hospitals. ⋯ It is concluded that regional techniques for peripartum analgesia have been widely accepted. Analgesia after Caesarean section could be improved. Epidural analgesia should be more widely available, especially in the many small hospitals in Ontario.
-
As more extensive and painful surgical procedures (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laminectomy, knee and shoulder reconstruction, hysterectomy) are being performed on an outpatient basis, the availability of sophisticated postoperative analgesic regimens are necessary to optimize the benefits of day-case surgery for both the patient and the health care provider. However, outcome studies are needed to evaluate the effects of these newer therapeutic approaches with respect to postoperative side effects, cost and important recovery variables. Recent studies suggest that factors other than pain per se must be controlled in order to reduce postoperative morbidity and facilitate the recovery process. ⋯ In conclusion, as a result of our enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of acute pain and the physiological basis of nociception, the provision of "stress free" anaesthesia with minimal postoperative discomfort is now possible for most patients undergoing ambulatory surgical procedures. The aim of any analgesic technique should not only be to lower the pain scores but also to facilitate earlier mobilization and to reduce perioperative complications, in particular PONV. In future, clinicians should be able to effectively treat postoperative pain using a combination of "balanced," "preemptive," and "peripheral" analgesia techniques without producing emetic sequelae.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The triple airway manoeuvre for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed patients.
The efficacy of the triple airway manoeuvre (mouth opening, head extension and jaw thrust) for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was compared with the standard insertion method. One hundred paralyzed patients were allocated randomly into two groups: in the control group (n = 50) the LMA was inserted by the standard method, and in the other (TAM group, n = 50) by the triple airway manoeuvre. In ten patients of each group, the position of the LMA and the epiglottis was assessed radiographically before insertion, after insertion but before cuff inflation, and after cuff inflation. ⋯ After cuff inflation the glottis was completely visible fibreoptically in 66% in the TAM group, compared with 14% in the control group (P < 0.001). Complete downfolding of the epiglottis was seen in 10% in the control group and none in the TAM group (P < 0.05). We conclude that in paralyzed patients LMA insertion with the triple airway manoeuvre provides wider pharyngeal space and decreases the incidence of epiglottic downfolding by the LMA compared with the standard method.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Optimal stimulating current for train-of-four stimulation in conscious subjects.
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal stimulating current for train-of-four (TOF) monitoring with regard to the return of TOF response and the discomfort associated with TOF. Two variables were examined at 60, 50, 40, 30, and 20 mA: (1) times from administration of vecuronium 80 micrograms.kg-1 to returns of responses to TOF determined accelographically in 75 anaesthetised patients and (2) discomfort associated with TOF in 15 awake volunteers using visual analogue scale (VAS). Times to return of the first response to stimulation at 60, 50, 40, and 30 mA were not different (29.1 +/- 11.2, 30.1 +/- 12.0, 31.9 +/- 12.6, and 35.4 +/- 14.2 min, respectively, mean +/- SD). ⋯ The VAS associated with TOF at 60, 50, 40, 30, and 20 mA were 7.3 +/- 1.9, 6.7 +/- 1.8, 6.0 +/- 2.0, 4.1 +/- 2.1, and 2.7 +/- 2.3, respectively. The VAS at 30 mA was less than at 60 and 50 mA (P < 0.05), and at 20 mA was less than at 60, 50, and 40 mA (P < 0.05). In conclusion it is suggested that, when testing conscious patients, 30 mA is the optimal stimulating current for TOF monitoring because it represents the best compromise of neuromuscular monitoring and patient discomfort.