Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
Many features can influence the choice of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), including ease of insertion, adequate ventilation pressures and lack of adverse effects. The goal of this randomized prospective trial was to compare the performance of the i-gel™ with that of the LMA-Supreme™. ⋯ Both the LMA-Supreme and the i-gel offer similar performance for positive pressure ventilation in paralyzed patients during general anesthesia. The i-gel was associated with a slightly faster insertion time and better fibrescopic visualization of the glottis. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01001078.
-
Patients must receive information in a manner that promotes understanding so they can make informed decisions about anesthesia and other medical interventions. Unfortunately, history is replete with examples of the negative consequences of inadequate disclosure of information and lack of patient understanding. While obtaining consent for anesthesia poses unique challenges, the ability of the anesthesiologist to engage the patient in meaningful discussion is critical as a means to ensure that the patient is truly informed. This narrative review aims to: 1) discuss the process of informed consent as it applies to anesthesia practice; 2) describe the salient issues related to patient capacity, disclosure, understanding, decision-making, and documentation of the informed consent process; and 3) discuss current strategies to improve the presentation and understanding of consent information. ⋯ Despite the unique challenges of obtaining consent for anesthesia on the day of surgery, attention to the manner in which information for anesthesia care is provided and adoption of simple strategies to enhance understanding can go a long way to ensure that decision-makers are appropriately informed.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative efficacy of uterotonic agents: in vitro contractions in isolated myometrial strips of labouring and non-labouring women.
To compare the in vitro contractile responses to oxytocin, ergonovine, prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2α), and misoprostol in isolated myometrium from non-labouring and labouring pregnant women. ⋯ Oxytocin induces superior myometrial contractions compared with ergonovine, PGF2α, and misoprostol. The effect of oxytocin is reduced in myometrium of women with oxytocin-augmented labour; however, it is still superior to the other uterotonics. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01689311.