Bone marrow transplantation
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Jul 2001
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPhase II study of a multi-course high-dose chemotherapy regimen incorporating cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin in stage IV breast cancer.
The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of multiple courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin and thiotepa with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation in women with advanced breast cancer. Forty-one patients with advanced hormone-refractory breast cancer were enrolled in the study. The treatment started with two courses of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 120 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FE(120)C) followed by PBPC harvesting. ⋯ In the patient group with a PFS > or = 18 months all patients had limited disease (metastatic disease in only one or two sites) and fewer patients had bone or liver metastases compared to the overall patient group (33% vs 51%). This report shows that three closely spaced courses of tCTC are feasible, with acceptable toxicity. Triple tCTC can achieve complete or partial remission in most patients and long-term PFS in a selected subgroup of patients who have limited metastatic disease and are responsive to conventional-dose chemotherapy.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Jul 2001
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyAllogeneic haemopoietic cell transplants in Australia, 1996--a multi-centre retrospective comparison of the use of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow.
A retrospective comparison was carried out on adult patients receiving HLA-identical allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplants from siblings in Australia in 1996, comparing bone marrow with G-CSF-mobilised peripheral blood stem cells. A total of 131 transplant recipients from nine centres were included in this study, of whom 79 received bone marrow, 44 blood stem cells and eight both. All but three of the 131 patients had cyclosporin and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. ⋯ Comparisons were carried out between the BM and PBSC groups. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, diagnosis, donor characteristics or pretransplant conditioning. Median time to neutrophil recovery of 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 14 days for PBSC recipients, compared to 19 days for marrow recipients (P < 0.0005). median time to platelet recovery of 20 x 10(9)/l was 17 days for PBSC recipients, compared to 28 days for marrow recipients (P < 0.0005). there were no significantly increased risks of either acute or chronic GVHD in the PBSC recipients. there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of major transplant-related complications, disease-free survival or overall survival.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Jul 2001
Clinical TrialDexamethasone, paclitaxel, etoposide, cyclophosphamide (d-TEC) and G-CSF for stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma.
Forty-one patients with multiple myeloma were treated with a novel stem cell mobilisation regimen. The primary end points were adequate stem cell mobilising ability (>1% circulating CD34-positive cells) and collection (> or = 4 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg), and safety. The secondary end point was activity against myeloma. ⋯ One patient died from multi-organ failure and progressive disease. Fifty percent of evaluable patients demonstrated a partial response and 28.6% of patients had a minor response. This novel dose-intense regimen was safe, capable of stem cell mobilisation and collection, even in heavily pre-treated patients, and active against the underlying myeloma.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Jun 2001
Comparative StudyProphylaxis of graft-versus-host disease with cyclosporine-prednisone is associated with increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
To determine the effect of two different graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens--cyclosporine with short course of methotrexate (CYA-MTX) and cyclosporine with prednisone (CYA-PRED)--on the incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 196 consecutive allogeneic related blood and marrow transplants performed at our institution utilizing one of these regimens. CYA-PRED was given to patients who were transplanted more recently because of concern about the increased risk of veno-occlusive disease of the liver, increased mucositis, and slower engraftment in patients receiving CYA-MTX. Prophylaxis with CYA-PRED was associated with a higher risk of development of cGVHD (risk ratio (RR) 3.5; 95% confidence intrerval (CI), 2.2-5.4). ⋯ Development of acute GVHD and cytomegalovirus mismatch were independent predictors of increased risk of cGVHD. We conclude that GVHD prophylaxis with CYA-PRED is associated with a higher overall rate of cGVHD compared to CYA-MTX. The type of GVHD prophylaxis should be considered when comparing the incidence of cGVHD reported in different studies.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialMobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is frequently used for mobilization of autologous CD34(+) progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection and support of high-dose chemotherapy. The administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy is typically followed by a myeloid growth factor and is associated with variable CD34 cell yields and morbidity. The two most commonly used myeloid growth factors for facilitation of CD34 cell harvests are granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). ⋯ After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with G-CSF or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34 cells and had faster platelet recovery with fewer patients requiring platelet transfusions than patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by GM-CSF. In summary, G-CSF alone is superior to GM-CSF alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An economic analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these three effective schedules is ongoing at the time of this writing.