Bone marrow transplantation
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Dec 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRandomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy.
Fifty patients with either lymphoid or selected solid tumor malignancies were apheresed an identical number of times for PBSC collection after being randomized to receive either G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone (arm I), or G-CSF at the same dose with GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (arm II). Growth factor(s) was/were given as the stem cell mobilizing agent for 5 days before the start of PBSC collection, and were continued throughout the 4 days of apheresis. Aspiration and cryopreservation of autologous bone marrow occurred on day 3 or 4 of growth factor(s). ⋯ The bone marrow buffy coat and PBSC product mononuclear cell count (x 10(8)/kg) and CD34+ cell count (x 10(6)/kg) collected by each method of stem cell mobilization was not significantly different. There is questionable clinical benefit with PBSC products mobilized with the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Perhaps different dosages, schedules, or other growth factor combinations with G-CSF might enhance these differences.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Dec 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialGM-CSF accelerates neutrophil recovery after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Patients with non-myeloid hematologic malignancies (including Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, myeloma and acute lymphoid leukemia) or solid tumors underwent cytoreductive conditioning regimens followed by either autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) (n = 343) or transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with (n = 44) or without bone marrow (BM) (n = 16). In a randomized double-blind phase III multi-center trial, patients received either granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, 10 micrograms/kg/day) or placebo by daily i.v. infusion beginning 24 h after bone marrow infusion and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) had recovered to > or = 1000/mm3, or for a maximum of 30 days. Median time to neutrophil recovery was significantly shorter in the GM-CSF group (18 vs 27 days, P < 0.001), and more GM-CSF patients had neutrophil recovery by day 30 (70 vs 48%). ⋯ No difference was noted in infection incidence or time to platelet independence. GM-CSF had no negative impact on time to relapse or long-term survival. These data indicate the positive influence of GM-CSF on neutrophil recovery and hospital stay in patients receiving ABMT for a variety of clinical indications.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · Jul 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialMobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by cyclophosphamide and rhGM-CSF in multiple myeloma.
Fifteen consecutive patients with multiple myeloma (MM) scheduled for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, were randomly selected to receive cyclophosphamide (CY) (4 g/m2) alone (group I) or associated with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) (5 micrograms/kg/day) (group II). The mean time of neutropenia after CY administration was 9.8 +/- 4.3 days in group I and 6.4 +/- 1.2 days in group II (P = 0.0228). ⋯ The mean number of cells infused per patient was 6.56 +/- 4.02 x 10(8) MNC/kg and 7.64 +/- 3.00 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg in group I and 6.25 +/- 4.03 x 10(8) MNC/kg and 8.16 +/- 9.73 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg in group II. The mean time to recover 0.5 x 10(9) granulocytes/I, 20 and 50 x 10(9) platelets/I in peripheral blood (PB) was 17.2 +/- 7.4, 13.4 +/- 3.7 and 16.5 +/- 6.9 days respectively, in group I and 13.3 +/- 1.7, 11.6 +/- 1.6 and 15 +/- 6.3 days, in group II. rhGM-CSF administration after CY treatment for PBPC mobilization in MM patients reduces the neutropenic period after CY and enhances apheresis CD34+ cell collection.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · May 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialLow-dose interferon-alpha 2b combined with hydroxyurea versus hydroxyurea alone for chronic myelogenous leukemia.
-
Bone Marrow Transplant. · May 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialRandomized study of the combination of hydroxyurea and interferon alpha versus hydroxyurea monotherapy during the chronic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML Study II). The German CML Study Group.
It is the long-term goal of the German CML Study Group and of the Süddeutsche Hämoblastosegruppe (SHG) to improve survival of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). In a first randomized study (CML Study I) monotherapies with hydroxyurea or interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) were compared with a standard busulfan regimen with regard to duration of the chronic phase and survival. ⋯ In a second randomized study the effect of the combination of IFN-alpha and hydroxyurea versus hydroxyurea monotherapy on survival is being investigated. This paper provides a first preliminary report on the study concept, patient recruitment, state of documentation and initial patients' characteristics 9 months after closure of the study.