Palliative medicine
-
Palliative medicine · Sep 2010
Multicenter StudyThe trajectory of palliative care costs over the last 5 months of life: a Canadian longitudinal study.
This study aimed to highlight the trajectory of palliative care costs over the last five months of life in five urban centres across Canada. ⋯ The knowledge gained from this study would be useful to policy makers when developing policies that could help families caring for a terminally ill loved one at home.
-
Palliative medicine · Sep 2010
Multicenter StudyPalliative care discharge from paediatric intensive care units in Great Britain.
We aim to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of children discharged to palliative care from 31 paediatric intensive care units in Great Britain, using a cohort of admissions and discharges from the database of paediatric intensive care units (Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet)). The patients included in this study were children discharged alive from paediatric intensive care units (n = 68882) between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2008. The main outcome measure was Odds Ratios for discharge of children from paediatric intensive care units to palliative care and their referral destination. ⋯ South Asian children referred to palliative care were less likely to receive this care in a hospice (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04,0.83) and more likely to receive it in a hospital setting (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.16,5.71). We conclude that children admitted to paediatric intensive care units have a very low rate of discharge to palliative care. Specific demographic and clinical variables are associated with referral to palliative care.
-
Palliative medicine · Sep 2010
Comparative StudySingle Question in Delirium (SQiD): testing its efficacy against psychiatrist interview, the Confusion Assessment Method and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.
In this study we address the research question; How sensitive is a single question in delirium case finding? Of 33 'target' admissions, consent was obtained from 21 patients. The single question: 'Do you think [name of patient] has been more confused lately?' was put to friend or family. Results of the Single Question in Delirium (SQiD) were compared to psychiatrist interview (ΨI) which was the reference standard. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and two other tools were also applied. Compared with ΨI, the SQiD achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 80% (95% CI 28.3-99.49%) and 71% (41.90-91.61%) respectively. The CAM demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 80% (51.91-95.67%) and the SQiD showed a NPV of 91% (58.72-99.77%). Kappa correlation of SQiD with the ΨI was 0.431 (p = 0.023). The CAM had a kappa value of 0.37 (p = 0.050). A further important finding in our study was that the CAM had only 40% sensitivity in the hands of minimally trained clinical users. ⋯ The SQiD demonstrates potential as a simple clinical tool worthy or further investigation.