Surgical endoscopy
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study.
Natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a technique still in experimental development that requires clinical trials to assess its safety and efficacy. We present a pilot prospective, randomized, three-arm clinical trial of 1-year duration that was conducted as a noninferiority trial comparing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and flexible single-incision surgery (FSIS) with conventional laparoscopy for elective cholecystectomy (NCT01558414). ⋯ Single-incision transumbilical approaches are not inferior for safety or effectiveness compared with conventional laparoscopy. The transumbilical approach using a flexible endoscope is just as effective and safe as the other two procedures and is a promising single-incision approach.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Blend mode reduces unintended thermal injury by laparoscopic monopolar instruments: a randomized controlled trial.
The purpose of this study was to compare histologic evidence of thermal injury at the epigastric and umbilical incisions after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using the monopolar "Bovie" instrument set on the higher voltage coag mode versus the lower voltage blend mode. We hypothesized that the higher voltage coag mode would create more unintended thermal tissue injury at the epigastric trocar's incision. ⋯ NCT016648060 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial.
Persistent pain is common after inguinal hernia repair. The methods of surgery and anesthesia influence the risk. Local anesthesia and laparoscopic procedures reduce the risk for postoperative pain in different time perspectives. The aim of this study was to compare open Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia (LLA) with laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) with respect to postoperative pain. ⋯ Patients who underwent the laparoscopic TEP procedure suffered less pain 6 weeks after inguinal hernia repair than those who underwent LLA. Groin pain affected the LLA patients' ability to perform strenuous activities such as sports more than TEP patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is smaller better?
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is said to provide improved cosmesis with a reduction in postoperative pain, but SILC involves a change in operative technique. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial compared cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain between 3- and 5-mm ports used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). ⋯ The use of 3-mm ports is technically feasible in patients undergoing LC for gallstones. The operating times are comparable with those for conventional LC, whereas the pain scores are reduced, and the cosmetic outcome is better.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Although early rehabilitation programs have been reported to be effective after laparoscopic colectomy, there is no report of the efficacy of rehabilitation programs after rectal cancer surgery. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an early rehabilitation program after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid or low rectal cancer in a randomized, controlled trial. ⋯ This randomized trial did not show that an early rehabilitation program is beneficial after laparoscopic low anterior resection. Our results confirm that postoperative ileus and acute voiding difficulty are major obstacles to fast-track surgery for mid or low rectal cancer. This study was registered (registration number NCT00606944).