Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Clinical Trial
Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of right heart hemodynamics during high-frequency jet ventilation.
To evaluate right ventricular dimensions and function by echocardiography in anesthetized patients during superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV). ⋯ Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of right heart hemodynamics did not show any significant difference after transition of ventilation to superimposed HFJV applying similar airway pressures. Furthermore, superimposed HFJV was safe and effective, it improved oxygenation, and it facilitated carbon dioxide elimination.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
The effect of a dissociative dose of ketamine on the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol hypnosis.
To compare the effect of a standardized stimulus during propofol-only hypnosis on the bispectral index (BIS) value with the effect of the injection of local anesthesia for surgery during ketamine plus propofol hypnosis (dissociative monitored anesthesia care). To determine whether ketamine increases the level of propofol hypnosis when used in dissociative doses. ⋯ This study demonstrated a positive BIS response to a standardized local anesthetic stimulus during propofol-only hypnosis and a zero response during ketamine plus propofol hypnosis (dissociative anesthesia). Ketamine administered in dissociative doses does not deepen the level of propofol hypnosis. Hypnosis alone does not imply general anesthesia. Patients move in response to inadequate local anesthesia. Because the ketamine analgesia is only transitory and the primary analgesia is not given intravenously, propofol-ketamine technique is not a total intravenous anesthetic technique (TIVA). Instead, propofol-ketamine technique may be classified as a form of monitored anesthesia care (MAC).
-
Cost containment, as an essential part of current effort to manage health care, has been examined thoroughly from the perspectives of finance and patient care. In this article, the ethics of cost containment are discussed from the vantage point of the health care provider. Cost-cutting initiatives, however necessary and sound, nevertheless may place anesthesiologists in situations of ethical conflict and ultimately interfere with their rights as workers and professionals. The anesthesiology community is encouraged to investigate the effect of cost-cutting measures on patients and physicians alike.