Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Teleconsultation compared with face-to-face consultation in the context of pre-anesthesia evaluation: TELANESTH, a randomized controlled single-blind non-inferiority study.
During the COVID crisis, pre-anesthesia teleconsultations were widely used leading to savings in time and money. However, the non-inferiority of this system has not yet been evaluated. ⋯ According to our criteria, PATC was not inferior to PAC for preoperative patient evaluation and may be an interesting economical, ecological alternative.
-
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is recognized as an important risk factor for perioperative complications. However, anesthesia management of HFpEF patients remains a considerable challenge without clear guidance. HFpEF is heterogeneous in its pathophysiological processes, diverse clinical presentations, adverse remodeling of cardiovascular and other organs, and clinical outcomes. ⋯ Five phenotypes of HFpEF patients are identified: A, O, P, C, and Y. The clinical features, anesthesia implications, and anesthesia management for each phenotype are highlighted and discussed. Such an approach to HFpEF patients in the operating room could deliver safe, high-quality perioperative care.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed in infants and young children in the prone position: A prospective randomized study.
To explore if the pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) modes are superior to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in optimizing intraoperative respiratory mechanics in infants and young children in the prone position. ⋯ In infants and young children undergoing spinal cord detethering surgery in the prone position, PCV-VG may be a better ventilation mode due to its ability to mitigate the increase in Ppeak and decrease in Cdyn while maintaining consistent VT.
-
Meta Analysis
Overall anesthesia department quality of clinical supervision of trainees over a year evaluated using mixed effects models.
Earlier studies of supervision in anesthesiology focused on how to evaluate the quality of individual anesthesiologist's clinical supervision of trainees. What is unknown is how to evaluate clinical supervision collectively, as provided by the department's faculty anesthesiologists. This information can be a metric that departments report annually or use to evaluate the effect of programs on the quality of clinical supervision over time. ⋯ Random effects meta-analysis of percentage incidences of maximum scores is a suitable statistical approach to analyze the daily supervision scores of individual anesthesiologists to evaluate the overall quality of clinical supervision provided to the trainees by the department over a year.
-
Review Comparative Study
Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: A systematic review.
Perioperative factors are probably essential for different oncological outcomes. This systematic review investigates the literature concerning overall mortality and postoperative complications after cancer surgery with inhalational (INHA) and intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). A search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including studies with patients undergoing surgery for cancer and where TIVA was compared with INHA. ⋯ In one study, the rate of pulmonary complications was significantly higher after INHA compared with TIVA, while other postoperative complications were comparable. There are currently four propensity-adjusted retrospective studies indicating that TIVA might be the preferred anesthetic choice in cancer surgery. However, evidence is currently of low quality and randomized clinical trials are required for further investigation.