Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of cocaine, lidocaine with epinephrine, and oxymetazoline for prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation.
The alpha-adrenergic agonist oxymetazoline was compared to cocaine and to lidocaine with epinephrine with respect to prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation. The nares of three groups of 14 patients each were topically pretreated with 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (group 1), 10% cocaine (group 2), or 0.05% oxymetazoline (group 3) prior to nasotracheal intubation. After intubation, epistaxis was estimated on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no bleeding, 1 representing blood on the nasotracheal tube only, 2 indicating blood pooling in the pharynx, and 3 representing blood in the pharynx sufficient to impede intubation. ⋯ In addition, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were examined prior to administration of the medications; at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes after administration of the medications; and after intubation. No significant differences were noted (p greater than 0.05) between the medications except for a slightly higher systolic BP for cocaine than for lidocaine with epinephrine at 15 minutes. The results of this double-blind, randomized trial demonstrate that the alpha-adrenergic agonist oxymetazoline is as effective as cocaine, and more effective than lidocaine with epinephrine, for the prevention of epistaxis associated with nasotracheal intubation.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Caudal analgesia for pediatric day case surgery: assessment of motor function prior to discharge.
The benefits of caudal analgesia are well recognized in the prevention of postoperative pain following pediatric surgery. The possibility of motor weakness may deter anesthetists from using this technique. This study investigates motor function prior to discharge in boys who, as day case patients, received caudal analgesia for pain relief following circumcision. ⋯ Three different dosage regimens of bupivacaine were compared. No important motor weakness was demonstrated, and there was no difference with respect to motor block in the three groups. Caudal analgesia may be recommended as a suitable technique for day case patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Partial attenuation of hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation with labetalol.
The effectiveness of labetalol (a combination nonselective beta and alpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) in modifying hemodynamic responses associated with rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation was evaluated. In a double-blind study, 24 ASA physical status I or II male patients scheduled for elective surgery were given either IV labetalol, 0.25 mg/kg (n = 8) or 0.75 mg/kg (n = 8), or a saline placebo (n = 8). Five minutes later, patients were given oxygen by mask and IV vecuronium, 0.01 mg/kg. ⋯ Within 30 seconds after intubation, patients in all three groups exhibited increases in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance, and rate pressure product and a decrease in stroke volume. However, patients in the 0.25 and 0.75 mg/kg labetalol groups, compared to those in the placebo group, had significantly lower increases in peak heart rate (33 +/- 2 and 27 +/- 3 vs. 44 +/- 7 beats/minute), peak mean arterial pressure (38 +/- 6 and 38 +/- 7 vs. 58 +/- 7 mmHg), and peak rate pressure product (7,726 +/- 260 and 7,215 +/- 300 vs. 14,023 +/- 250 units). The results show that these doses of labetalol significantly blunt, but do not completely block, autonomic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Attenuation of the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with preinduction intravenous labetalol.
Endotracheal intubation following anesthesia induction frequently produces hypertension and tachycardia. This study evaluated the efficacy of preinduction IV labetalol for attenuating the hemodynamic responses to intubation following thiopental and succinylcholine induction of anesthesia. Two hours after diazepam (10 mg by mouth), 60 patients were randomized in a double-blind manner and received IV saline or labetalol at doses of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, or 1 mg/kg in a parallel design study. ⋯ All doses of labetalol significantly attenuated the rate-pressure product increase immediately postintubation versus placebo. There was a dose-dependent attenuation of the increases in heart rate and the systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures versus placebo following intubation. IV labetalol at doses up to 0.75 mg/kg offers an effective pharmacologic means of attenuating preoperative hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation.
-
Apneic, anesthetized patients frequently develop airway obstruction or may be disconnected from ventilatory support. The rate of PaCO2 rise is usually assumed to be equal to that of anesthetized humans who are receiving apneic oxygenation. Apneic oxygenation may eliminate CO2 because it requires a continuous O2 flow. ⋯ Piecewise linear approximation yielded a PaCO2 increase of 12 mmHg during the first minute of apnea, and 3.4 mmHg/minute thereafter. These values should be employed when estimating the duration of apnea from PaCO2 change for anesthetized patients who lack ventilatory support. In addition, it appears that the flows of O2 that most earlier investigators used when delivering apneic oxygenation probably did not eliminate significant CO2 quantities.