Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A single bolus dose of esmolol in the prevention of intubation-induced tachycardia and hypertension in an ambulatory surgery unit.
The efficacy of a single bolus dose of esmolol in the prevention of intubation-induced tachycardia and hypertension was studied in a double-blind manner. Thirty patients from the Ambulatory Surgery Unit at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center were prospectively randomized to receive a placebo, 100 mg of esmolol, or 200 mg of esmolol immediately prior to induction (2.5 to 3.0 minutes before intubation). ⋯ The average maximum BP increase was 47% in the placebo group versus 22% and 19% in the esmolol 100 mg and esmolol 200 mg groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two esmolol groups. This study demonstrates the efficacy of a single bolus dose of esmolol in blunting the tachycardic and hypertensive responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in an ambulatory surgery setting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effects of alfentanil and lidocaine on the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
This study was undertaken to determine whether lidocaine and/or alfentanil can effectively abolish or attenuate the increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and rate pressure product (RPP) associated with rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1 received saline 10 ml, group 2 received lidocaine 2 mg/kg, group 3 received alfentanil 15 micrograms/kg, and group 4 received alfentanil 30 micrograms/kg. ⋯ Blood pressure (BP) and HR were recorded at the following times: before induction; after induction but before laryngoscopy and intubation; and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation. Alfentanil 15 and 30 micrograms/kg given in rapid sequence fashion with thiopental and succinylcholine effectively blunted the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Lidocaine 2 mg/kg and saline were found to be ineffective in blunting these same responses.
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Simulation technique for difficult intubation: teaching tool or new hazard?
This investigation evaluated the risks of a simulation drill designed to improve the skill of anesthesia personnel in dealing with an unexpected difficult intubation. In a controlled prospective study, 40 patients with normal airways scheduled to undergo noncardiothoracic surgery were randomized into two groups of 20 patients. In the control group, intubation was performed by standard techniques. ⋯ There were five uncomplicated esophageal intubations in the simulation group compared with none in the control group (p = 0.001). No other adverse events were recorded. The potential hazards of esophageal intubation should be considered before this simulation drill is performed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of cocaine, lidocaine with epinephrine, and oxymetazoline for prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation.
The alpha-adrenergic agonist oxymetazoline was compared to cocaine and to lidocaine with epinephrine with respect to prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation. The nares of three groups of 14 patients each were topically pretreated with 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (group 1), 10% cocaine (group 2), or 0.05% oxymetazoline (group 3) prior to nasotracheal intubation. After intubation, epistaxis was estimated on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no bleeding, 1 representing blood on the nasotracheal tube only, 2 indicating blood pooling in the pharynx, and 3 representing blood in the pharynx sufficient to impede intubation. ⋯ In addition, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were examined prior to administration of the medications; at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes after administration of the medications; and after intubation. No significant differences were noted (p greater than 0.05) between the medications except for a slightly higher systolic BP for cocaine than for lidocaine with epinephrine at 15 minutes. The results of this double-blind, randomized trial demonstrate that the alpha-adrenergic agonist oxymetazoline is as effective as cocaine, and more effective than lidocaine with epinephrine, for the prevention of epistaxis associated with nasotracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of labetalol or lidocaine on the hemodynamic response to intubation: a controlled randomized double-blind study.
Labetalol, a combined alpha 1- and nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking drug, was compared to lidocaine or saline to minimize the hypertensive and tachycardic response to intubation in a controlled randomized double-blind study in patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Forty adult patients were divided into four groups of 10 each: placebo (saline), lidocaine 100 mg, labetalol 5 mg, or labetalol 10 mg. The double-blind preparation was administered as an IV bolus just prior to induction and 2 min before the stimulus of laryngoscopy and intubation. ⋯ Labetalol 10 mg prevented a rise in heart rate after intubation compared to patients who received placebo, lidocaine 100 mg, or labetalol 5 mg. The hypertensive response to intubation was similar in all four groups. Labetalol 10 mg IV just prior to induction of anesthesia is a safe and cost-effective means of preventing tachycardia but not hypertension in response to laryngoscopy and intubation.