Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2002
Upper airway infection and pediatric anesthesia: how is the evidence based?
Anesthesia for the child with an upper respiratory infection remains one of the most common, yet contentious, issues facing the pediatric anesthesiologist. A general lack of evidence-based research has led to disparities in the manner in which children with upper respiratory infections have been traditionally managed. More recent research, however, suggests that children with uncomplicated infections can be managed safely, given that most complications can be anticipated, recognized, and treated. This review summarizes the evolving literature regarding cancellation of surgery for the child with an upper respiratory infection, perioperative outcomes, and anesthetic management.
-
In neonates, epidural catheters inserted at the sacral hiatus can easily be advanced to a lumbar or thoracic level. These 'caudal catheters' are popular because they allow the neonate to benefit from epidural analgesia without the concerns of spinal cord injury potentially associated with primary thoracic placement in an asleep neonate. This review looks at use and benefits, and risks and complications of caudal epidural catheters in neonates. ⋯ Epidural anesthesia and analgesia for neonates should be performed and managed by pediatric anesthesiologists. Potential risks and complications must be appreciated and all steps to maximize safety of the technique must be taken. In particular, close postoperative observation and pain service management are indispensable. Future research should investigate the risks of caudal and segmentally placed catheters in neonates, study the role of epidural analgesia in outcome improvement for neonates, and guide us to safer use of local anesthetics suitable for neonates with their pharmacologic immaturity.