Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Feb 2009
ReviewManagement of mini-cardiopulmonary bypass devices: is it worth the energy?
To address the role of mini-cardiopulmonary bypass systems in cardiac operations, with specific respect to clinical outcome. ⋯ Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass systems reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusions. Other improvements in postoperative outcome are more debated. They require a long learning curve and are more expensive. A cost analysis based on a large randomized controlled trial is still needed to clarify the potential future role of these systems in clinical practice.
-
The present review evaluates the evidence available in the literature tracking perioperative mortality and morbidity as well as the pathogenesis and management of acute lung injury (ALI) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. ⋯ Knowledge of the perioperative risk factors of major complications and understanding of the mechanisms of postthoracotomy ALI enable anesthesiologists to implement 'protective' lung strategies including the use of low tidal volume (VT) with recruitment maneuvers, a goal-directed fluid approach and prophylactic treatment with inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonists.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Feb 2009
ReviewCurrent aspects of perioperative fluid handling in vascular surgery.
Perioperative fluid management influences patient outcome. Vascular surgery unites various surgical procedures, mainly with a high impact on patients who often have relevant preexisting illnesses. There are only scarce data on this specialty, forcing the clinician to extrapolate existing data when planning perioperative fluid management. This review aims to summarize the underlying facts. ⋯ The basis of fluid therapy in vascular surgery is a careful differential indication of the respective classes of preparations. A goal-directed approach might help to avoid hypovolaemia.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Feb 2009
ReviewUpdate on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery: are they worth it?
To consider optimal analgesic strategies for thoracic surgical patients. ⋯ There is good evidence that paravertebral block can provide acceptable pain relief compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy. Important side-effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, nausea, and vomiting appear to be less frequent with paravertebral block than with thoracic epidural analgesia. Paravertebral block is associated with better pulmonary function and fewer pulmonary complications than thoracic epidural analgesia. Importantly, contraindications to thoracic epidural analgesia do not preclude paravertebral block, which can also be safely performed in anesthetized patients without an apparent increased risk of neurological injury. The place of paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is less clear.