Journal of cardiac surgery
-
This study was designed to compare short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) via median sternotomy in patients with single-vessel left anterior descending (LAD) artery disease. ⋯ Short-term as well as long-term outcomes of MIDCAB in terms of mortality, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization are satisfactory and as safe and effective as OPCAB via sternotomy.
-
Comparative Study
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on congenital heart surgery practice: An alarming change in demographics.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of COVID-19 outbreak on congenital cardiac surgery practice in a single center. ⋯ Congenital cardiac surgery practice can be safely maintained with restricted case volume during the pandemic period. It is alarming that patients in the deprived areas cannot access pediatric cardiac surgery and possibly other health services because of closure of the borders between countries.
-
The coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic and the decision-making process of whether to perform urgent procedures during a surge are issues that will likely not disappear in the near future as reflected by the current rise in COVID cases in the southern and western United States and the resurgent numbers of confirmed cases around that world leading to are leading to new lock-downs. Multi-disciplinary discussions will continue to be important to decide individual risk and benefit profiles for patients with asymptomatic COVID patients moving forward. While imperfect, this most recent study provides more insight to some of the risks that should be weighed in these discussions. Further prospective, longitudinal research and better understanding of the heterogeneity of the COVID positive patient will further enhance understanding the decision-making process in the cardiac surgical patient through these difficult times.
-
Case Reports
COVID-19 patient bridged to recovery with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
In severe cases, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) viral pathogen produces hypoxic respiratory failure unable to be adequately supported by mechanical ventilation. The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains unknown, with the few publications to date lacking detailed patient information or management algorithms all while reporting excessive mortality. ⋯ With proper patient selection and careful attention to hemodynamic management, ECMO remains a reasonable treatment option for patients with COVID-19.
-
Covid-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020. Responses to this crisis integrated resource allocation for the increased amount of infected patients while maintaining an adequate response to other severe and life-threatening diseases. Though cardiothoracic patients are at high risk for Covid-19 severe illness, postponing surgeries would translate to increased mortality and morbidity. We reviewed our practice during the initial time of the pandemic, with emphasis on safety protocols. ⋯ While guaranteeing a prompt response to emergent, urgent, and high priority cases, novel safety measures in individual protection, patients circuits, and preoperative diagnoses of symptomatic and asymptomatic infection were adopted. The surgical results corroborate that it was safe to undergo cardiothoracic surgery during the initial time of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new policies will be maintained while the virus stays in the community.