Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Comparative Study
Comparison between distally based peroneal and posterior tibial artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the lower extremity.
Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous (DPAPF) flaps and distally based posterior tibial artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous (DPTAPF) flaps are widely used to reconstruct soft-tissue defects of the distal lower leg, ankle, and foot. However, a comparative study of both flaps in a considerable sample size is lacking. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of the flaps and provide referential evidence for selection of flaps. ⋯ The DPAPF flap was superior to the DPTAPF flap with respect to reliability and decreased donor-site morbidities. The former is the recommended preferential choice between the two.
-
Clinical volume has been associated with rate of complications and mortality for various conditions and procedures. We aim to analyze the relationship between annual hospital burn admission, patient safety indicators (PSI), line infections, and inpatient mortality. We hypothesize that high facility volume will correlate with better outcomes. ⋯ There was a significant association between higher hospital volume and decreased likelihood of patient safety indicators and mortality. There was no observed relationship with line infections. These findings could inform future verification policies of US burn centers.
-
The risk of infection of skin and soft tissue chronic wounds by gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens growing in biofilms is a major health-care concern. In this study we test a formulation of silver sulfadiazine, vitamin A and lidocaine (AF-SSD) for aerosol administration against biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and biofilms of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) strains of Staphylococcus aureus. The aerosol allows the administration of AF-SSD without the direct contact with the wound and avoids contamination of the product after reiterative usage. ⋯ AF-SSD clearly affected biofilm viability, biomass and structure, in the three bacterial strains tested. AF-SSD displayed a strong anti-biofilm effect, showing total bactericidal activity on biofilms of P. aeruginosa at a 400-fold dilution of the product, and after a 100-fold and 10-fold dilution for MRSA and MSSA, respectively. Considering the benefits of aerosol administration, our results support this kind of formulation as a potential improvement over conventional treatments with silver sulfadiazine.