Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Review Meta Analysis
The national burden of mortality and its associated factors among burn patients in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Despite all advances in burn prevention, treatment, acute care, and rehabilitation, burn injuries continue to cause significant mortality and disability in Ethiopia. Thus, this review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled prevalence and the determinants of mortality in Ethiopia. ⋯ The national prevalence of mortality among burn patients in Ethiopia was high. The extent of burn, presence of comorbidity, and 3rd degree burns were significant predictors of mortality. We strongly recommend that health care workers give special attention to burn patients with greater extent and depth of burn, and for those who have comorbid diseases.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide combined with botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) combined with botulinum toxin type A (BTA) for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. ⋯ This meta-analysis showed that the combined use of BTA and TCA demonstrates high effectiveness in scar treatment, but its influence on scar thickness is limited. Future research should further explore the sources of heterogeneity and validate the long-term effects and safety of this therapy.
-
Pediatric thermal injuries can have profound physical and psychological effects. Long-term care, including wound dressing selection, significantly impacts outcomes. This study compared treatment related variables and long-term results of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) and polyurethane foam (PU-foam) dressings in pediatric burn care. ⋯ BNC dressing benefits include significantly fewer anesthesia procedures, a reduced number of inpatient dressing changes and a shorter hospital stays, supporting the use of BNC dressing. Long-term scar outcomes with BNC are comparable to established dressings like PU-foam. Further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
-
One of the most important duties of the members of the treatment team is to pay attention to the mental, psychological, and social aspects of burn patients. One of the concerns of these patients during their stay in the hospital is the fear of rejection. The objective of this research is to examine the concept of 'fear of rejection' among patients hospitalized with burn injuries. ⋯ Based on the results of this study, it can be said that the fear of social rejection, characterized by an inability to perform roles and the visualization of a foggy future, significantly affects the psychological and physical health of burn patients, potentially delaying their recovery. Assisting these patients in reaching their fullest potential to contribute to society post-discharge, and fostering optimism for a promising future, constitute a paramount aspect of daily care and ongoing support.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Outcome comparison of the most commonly employed wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burns ≥50% TBSA - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Early wound coverage is one of the most essential factors influencing the survival of extensively burned patients, especially those with a total body surface area (TBSA) burned greater than 50 %. In patients with limited donor sites available for autografting, techniques such as the Meek micrograft procedure or cultured epidermal allografts (CEA) have proven to be viable alternatives. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of different wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burn injuries ≥ 50 % TBSA in the past 17 years. ⋯ Comparison of the four techniques highlighted differences in terms of all outcomes assessed, and each technique was associated with different advantages. Interestingly autografting, the option with the highest graft take rate, was also associated with the highest mortality. This study not only serves to provide the first comparison of the most commonly used techniques in major burn reconstruction, but also highlights the need for prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of the different techniques to ultimately establish whether a true superior option exists.