Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Failure of therapeutic ultrasound in healing burn injuries.
Experimental observations suggest that therapeutic ultrasound stimulates wound healing. Despite the controversy concerning its efficiency, this procedure is commonly implemented. ⋯ No stimulating effect of ultrasound could be demonstrated in these two groups, monitored by histological examination and a size index. These results discourage the clinical administration of therapeutic ultrasound to enhance the healing of burns.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A comparative study of silicone net dressing and paraffin gauze dressing in skin-grafted sites.
This prospective randomized study has compared paraffin gauze dressing (n = 19) with silicone net dressing (Mepitel, n = 19) applied as the first layer to newly grafted burn wounds. At the first postoperative dressing visual analogue pain scores were greater in the paraffin gauze group (mean 4.4) than in the silicone net group (mean 1.4, P < 0.01). ⋯ Dressings were harder to remove in the paraffin gauze group as assessed by a simple scoring system (P < 0.001). In conclusion silicone net dressing confers advantages over conventional paraffin gauze, especially in reducing patient discomfort during dressing changes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Topical ketorolac has no antinociceptive or anti-inflammatory effect in thermal injury.
This study investigated the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in human thermal injury. Twelve healthy unmedicated volunteers had identical burn injuries produced on the medial side of both calves with a 49 degrees C 15 x 25 mm thermode. ⋯ Burn injury led to a decrease in HPDT, HPT and MPDT, an increase in EI and development of mechanical hyperalgesia (P < 0.05). Ketorolac gel had no effect on any of the nociceptive or inflammatory variables studies (P > 0.2).
-
Case Reports Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Cica-Care gel sheeting in the management of hypertrophic scarring.
A prospective, controlled clinical trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of two types of silicone gel, Silastic Gel Sheeting (SGS) and Cica-Care (CC), in the management of hypertrophic scars. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to SGS and CC groups and their hypertrophic scars were divided into treated and control areas. Extensometric measurements were made at monthly intervals for 6 months and significant improvement of the treated areas relative to the control areas was observed. The two gels were not significantly different in efficacy or safety, but CC, being more adhesive and more comfortable than SGS, has advantages in ease of use and patient acceptability.