Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
-
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. · May 2020
Meta AnalysisAccuracy of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores for predicting serious complications in adult patients with febrile neutropenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
We compared the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores for identifying serious complications in febrile neutropenia patients. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to March 19, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed quality. ⋯ Pooled sensitivity and specificity for CISNE ≥ 3 was 78.9 % (95 % CI: 65.3 %-88.1 %) and 64.9 % (95 % CI: 49.6 %-77.7 %), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for CISNE ≥ 1 was 96.7 % (95 % CI: 93.6 %-98.3 %) and 22.2 % (95 % CI: 15.6 %-30.4 %), respectively. The CISNE score had higher sensitivity and may be more useful than the MASCC score in the acute setting.
-
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. · Jan 2020
ReviewPrevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A review of recent findings.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an adverse effect of chemotherapy that is frequently experienced by patients receiving treatment for cancer. CIPN is caused by many of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, including taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and bortezomib. ⋯ This review focuses on the etiology of CIPN and will highlight the various approaches developed for prevention and treatment. The goal is to guide studies to identify, test, and standardize approaches for managing CIPN.
-
Spin, the misrepresentation of research findings, in clinical trial abstract has been shown to influence how oncologist rate a drug's efficacy. ⋯ Spin is prevalent in the abstracts of oncology clinical trials that measure OS and a surrogate endpoint. The conclusion sections of abstracts were most prone to contain spin. When OS was the primary endpoint, spin was primarily used to distract from the nonsignificant OS data. To mitigate unintentional hype for cancer therapies, we recommend authors structure their conclusions around patient-important outcomes.
-
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. · Nov 2019
Meta AnalysisUpfront treatment for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 14,533 patients over 29 randomized clinical trials.
Choice of treatment for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma poses a difficult task due to an ever-increasing plethora of different regimens. Attempting to clarify this subject, we performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 29 randomized clinical trials, enrolling 14,533 patients, and comparing 25 different treatment regimens regarding overall survival(OS), progression-free survival(PFS), complete response(CR), overall response rate(ORR) and toxicity. Head-to-head comparisons for all regimens and ranking of best treatments are reported. ⋯ These results confirm obsolescence of classical regimens (such as VAD and MP) while pointing out benefits in efficacy resulting from incorporation of quadruplets and triplets combining new agents (Dara-VMP, VRd and VMPT-VT) and supports current rational of treatment until progression or prohibitive toxicity, especially when including lenalidomide. Based on this data, we would recommended incorporation of strategies combining novel agents (monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory imide drugs and proteasome inhibitors) in triplets or quadruplets and/or those comprising long term use of lenalidomide as standard frontline treatments. Moreover, this study settles daratumumab's place as an attractive alternative for upfront treatment.
-
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. · Nov 2019
Utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the evaluation of sarcomas: A systematic review.
Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumours with variable clinical outcomes. Their presence in multiple body locations represents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an imaging tool that provides semiquantitative measurements of radiotracer concentration in tissue, such as SUVmax (standardised uptake value) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate the utility of PET/CT in sarcoma grading and prognostication, evaluation of treatment response, staging and restaging. ⋯ Overall, higher quality evidence demonstrated PET/CT to be an important contributor towards sarcoma grading, prognostication and evaluation of treatment response. Larger prospective trials will be helpful to further establish the clinical value of PET/CT in sarcoma staging and restaging.