The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
-
Appropriate place of death for cancer patients: views of general practitioners and hospital doctors.
The majority of cancer patients in the United Kingdom die in a National Health Service hospital, a setting that is contrary to the wishes of those patients expressing a preference to die elsewhere, for example at home or in a hospice. ⋯ A greater proportion of cases where patients died from cancer in settings other than a specialist services unit were considered appropriate by general practitioners compared with deaths in a specialist services unit. For a considerable minority of patients, death in a specialist services unit was not considered appropriate by the general practitioners or by the hospital doctors. Improvements in local hospice facilities, community hospitals and community support would mean that a substantial proportion of hospital admissions could be avoided and thus cancer patients could die in more appropriate settings.
-
In November 1992, a pilot scheme was established in Doncaster to provide an on-site physiotherapy service in six non-fundholding general practices covering a population of approximately 44,000 people. ⋯ The increase in the use of the physiotherapy service was possibly caused, in part, by general practitioners sending patients to on-site physiotherapy who previously would have been referred to orthopaedics and, largely, by an increase in the treatment of patients who previously would not have been referred to hospital. Physiotherapy based in general practice can be a substitute for hospital-based physiotherapy and can contribute to a reduction in referrals to orthopaedics and rheumatology outpatient departments. However, it can result in an increase in use of physiotherapy services.
-
Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level is raised in 80% of patients undergoing colonic resection for cancer. Subsequent elevation in the follow-up period may precede signs and symptoms as an indicator of recurrent disease. there is little evidence that "classical" follow up of patients in the general surgical outpatient clinic improves either survival or quality of life. Regular carcinoembryonic antigen level estimation requested by the general practitioner, allied to day-case colonoscopic surveillance may be a more rational approach. ⋯ Sequential laboratory estimation of carcinoembryonic antigen level organized by the general practitioner may represent an accurate method of detecting recurrent colorectal disease. Hospital review could be limited to colonoscopic surveillance and restaging of patients referred with evidence of recurrent disease.
-
Compared with other clinical disciplines, academic general practice is in a difficult situation with respect to patient care. There are at least three different possible models of working arrangements for heads of departments of general practice: to work in a surgery in a medical school; to work in a surgery in the community, separate from a part-time university post; or to work part-time in a surgery in the community, separate from a university post. ⋯ Working in a surgery in a medical school represented a well-balanced model of time allocation between patient care, research and education and seemed to be a good approach for the integration of general practice into medical schools. Working part-time in a surgery with a university post is an appropriate model for academic integration, but patient care seemed to be neglected. Those doctors working mainly in the community with a part-time university post were able to provide continuity of care and to come into close contact with the everyday problems of general practitioners. However, they might have to struggle for academic recognition.