Current opinion in oncology
-
In early 2015 the National Institutes of Health launched a new, national Precision Medicine Initiative with the primary goal of rapidly improving the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancers. The first-stage emphasis on oncology presents unique opportunities for clinical oncology to influence how the ethical challenges of precision medicine are to be articulated and addressed. Thus, a review of recent developments in connection with the Initiative, in particular on core ethics issues in clinical genomics, is a useful starting point. ⋯ The first tests of precision medicine ethics in practice will be in clinical oncology, providing a rare opportunity to shape the agenda and integrate practical ethics considerations. These efforts can benefit from pre-existing research ethics analyses and recommendations from clinical and translational genetics research.
-
Antigens recognized by T cells in tumors include differentiation antigens, overexpressed antigens, cancer-testis, and mutated tumor neoantigens. Ionizing radiation causes damage to multiple biomolecules by direct energy deposition or by generation of free radicals, leading to cell death when the damage cannot be repaired. Tumor cell death induced by radiation will generate specific molecular signals that are sensed by antigen-presenting cells and stimulate their maturation and ability to cross-present tumor-derived antigens to T cells. Immunogenic cell death will complement the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We will provide the emerging information coming from preclinical and clinical testing about the combinations of immunotherapies and radiotherapy. ⋯ Radiation therapy is confirmed to be a sensitizer of tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials, and its application will be easy to implement and widespread. Conversely, many issues need to be addressed before radiotherapy can become such a valid immunogenic tool. An area of increasing importance will be the development of suitable biomarkers that will be able to reliably assess 'immunogenic tumor cell death', immune effector stimulation, and adaptive immunity. Such an immune profile of biomarkers will aid in searching for an optimal combination of radiotherapy and immunomodulation and allows patient selection and response prediction.
-
In this review, we focus on the recent findings and future challenges in cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. ⋯ The main challenge for the near future will be to predict efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade and to predict and prevent immune-related adverse events. More research should be done in order to find potential biomarkers that predict treatment response and/or toxicity; the optimal administration route, dosage, and frequency; and possible combinations of therapies that have an added or synergetic effect.
-
The development of 'immune checkpoint inhibitors' or drugs targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has been a stunning success of cancer immunotherapy. This review provides a timely overview of the biology and function of the PD-1 pathway and discusses the rationale for therapeutic inhibition of this pathway in lymphoma. ⋯ A plethora of clinical trials are in progress testing immune checkpoint inhibitors in many subtypes of lymphoma, which will define their role both as a monotherapy and in combination with other biologic agents.
-
To evaluate the place and the usefulness of sedation in medical practice at the end of life. ⋯ This article presents the state-of-the-art (definitions, indications, and technical aspects) about continuous sedation, followed by an ethical reflection essentially based on the 'Principle of Double Effect', the impact on life expectancy, and the concept of 'natural death'.