Leukemia & lymphoma
-
Leukemia & lymphoma · Sep 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized trial of induction therapy (daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone versus daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, cytarabine and 6-thioguanine) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with long-term follow-up: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E3486).
In this study of previously untreated adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) performed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, patients were randomized to induction therapy with either DVP (daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 daily, days 1, 2 and 3; prednisone 60 mg/m2 daily orally days 1-35; and vincristine 2 mg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22) or DATVP (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 daily, days 1, 2 and 3; cytarabine 25 mg/m2 intravenous bolus followed by 200 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion on days 1-5; 6-thioguanine 100 mg/m2 orally every 12 h on days 1-5; vincristine 2 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8; and prednisone 60 mg/m2/day orally, days 1-7. Complete responders to both regimens received the same post-remission therapy, which consisted of a single course of cytarabine 3 gm/m2 infused over 1 h every 12 h for 12 doses. One month later those patients still in remission received six cycles of consolidation therapy with MACHO (cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 vincristine 2mg all intravenously on day 1 with prednisone 100 mg/m2 orally daily on days 1-5. ⋯ DATVP was more toxic than DVP. Intensification of treatment for adults with ALL may not improve outcome. Progress in the treatment of adults with ALL will require the identification of new agents for this neoplasm.
-
Leukemia & lymphoma · Sep 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialOpen-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Pegfilgrastim is composed of the protein filgrastim to which a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) is covalently bound at the N-terminal residue resulting in decreased renal clearance and increased plasma half-life compared with filgrastim. This open-label, randomized, phase 2 study compared two doses of single administration pegfilgrastim (60 and 100 microg/kg) with daily doses of filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day) or no cytokine treatment after standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 50 elderly patients. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 4 (severe) neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) in cycle 1. ⋯ The incidence of febrile neutropenia (defined as ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l and temperature > 38.2degrees C) was low (10% of patients). Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to daily filgrastim. Once per chemotherapy cycle administration of pegfilgrastim was comparable to filgrastim in this clinical setting.
-
Leukemia & lymphoma · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialA phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial of iseganan for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving stomatotoxic chemotherapy (PROMPT-CT trial).
Microfloral invasion and colonization of oral cavity mucosal tissues contribute to the pathophysiology of ulcerative oral mucositis (UOM). Iseganan is an analog of Protegrin-1, a naturally occurring peptide with broad-spectrum microbicidal activity. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate iseganan in preventing UOM after stomatotoxic therapy. ⋯ On the 5-point NCI CTC scale, iseganan patients experienced lower stomatitis scores (1.6 and 2.0 (P = 0.0131). Iseganan was well tolerated; no systemic absorption was detected. Iseganan is safe and may be effective in reducing UOM and its clinical sequelae.
-
Leukemia & lymphoma · Jun 2003
Multicenter StudyCNS prophylaxis and treatment in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: variation in practice and lessons from the literature.
Practices regarding central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis and treatment for non-"high-grade" lymphomas are not standardized. We designed a survey to address the CNS surveillance, prophylaxis and treatment (S + P + T) habits of Ontario oncologists, to compare tertiary with community care and gauge interest in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We mailed 145 questionnaires to oncologists/hematologists registered at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario between 1980 and 1999. ⋯ In conclusion, CNS surveillance and prophylaxis in non-"high-grade" NHL is highly variable, probably because there are poorly defined risk factors, inconclusive prophylaxis efficacy and the inconvenience/toxicity of therapy. Patients at high risk by International prognostic index criteria are at an increased risk for CNS relapse. A RCT comparing standard chemotherapy with or without CNS prophylaxis in selected patients is needed.