Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Nov 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparative effectiveness and tolerance study of a new galenic etomidate formula].
One of the major disadvantages of etomidate is the high frequency of pain on injection. A new galenic formulation based on a lipid emulsion for etomidate (Etomidat-Lipuro) was compared with the commercial standard (etomidate in propylene glycol, Hypnomidate) in a prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical evaluation in 232 patients undergoing elective surgery in general anaesthesia. The patients were premedicated with flunitrazepam 2 hours before the investigation. Two intravenous cannulas were inserted in veins of forearm or back of the hand. One cannula was only used for the application of etomidate and removed immediately after injection. General anaesthesia was induced with 0.3 mg/kg etomidate at an injection rate of 20 mg/30 s. If the patient did not complain of pain or other sensations during injection spontaneously, he was questioned for 15 s after beginning of injection. The arm used for application of etomidate was kept free of any manipulation during the operation and the following five postoperative days. ⋯ There were marked differences between the two etomidate preparations concerning venous irritation. About 20% of the patients receiving the hypnotic in propylene glycol complained spontaneously of pain on injection, whereas none with the lipid emulsion. No difference was found in the incidence of myoclonic movements. The time interval between the beginning of injection and loss of eyelid closure reflex was about 50 s and not different for the two galenic formulations. Blood pressure during and after induction of anaesthesia did not differ. The heart rate in the group of patients with etomidate in lipid emulsion was slightly increased before and immediately after intubation compared to the propylene glycol group. 4% of the patients in the propylene glycol group suffered from postoperative venous complications as reddening, swelling, induration or pain. These complications could not be seen in the lipid emulsion group.
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Aug 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[The hemodynamic effects of atracurium in geriatric patients during intravenous anesthesia using propofol].
Neuromuscular blocking drugs may produce cardiovascular effects by virtue of drug-induced release of histamine or other vasoactive substances from circulating mast cells, effects at cardiac muscarinic receptors or effects at nicotinic receptors at autonomic ganglia. These haemodynamic reactions may be more pronounced in elderly patients, since cardiovascular compensating mechanisms are attenuated with advancing age. The present study was designed to investigate the cardiovascular effects of atracurium with special regard to the reactions in younger adults and in elderly patients. ⋯ Since the results of the present study suggest that haemodynamic reactions in younger adults and in the elderly are rare, atracurium can be recommended for neuromuscular blockade in elderly patients under propofol anaesthesia.
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Aug 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Single-shot spinal anesthesia versus continuous spinal anesthesia using the CoSPAN catheter].
We compared conventional single-shot spinal anaesthesia (SS) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CS) in a randomised prospective study. ⋯ Fractionated injection of the local anesthetic via a spinal catheter was more precise in achieving the desired maximum cephalad spread than SS. The CS group revealed a significantly more stable blood pressure than the SS group. The use of a short-acting local anesthetic for CS provided an earlier postoperative return of motor function of the legs. Postspinal headache appears not to be a clinically relevant problem when 28-gauge spinal catheters are used.
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial[Postoperative pain therapy following total endoprosthetic surgery on the hip using a continuous 3-in-1 blockade].
40 patients who had undergone total hip replacement were included in a randomised prospective study. Postoperative pain management was performed with a continuous 3-in-1 block combined with demand-adapted intravenous meperidine titration (3-in-1 catheter group; n = 20) or by demand-adapted intravenous meperidine titration alone (control group; n = 20). The 3-in-1 catheter was placed before the start of anesthesia, and the patients received 30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine via this catheter. ⋯ Placement of the 3-in-1 catheters was without complications. For the management of postoperative pain following total hip replacement a continuous 3-in-1 block alone was often insufficient but postoperative meperidine requirements were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Toxic bupivacaine plasma concentrations were not measured.
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Feb 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[N2O-supplemented intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia. A comparative study of the sympathoadrenergic reaction and postoperative vigilance].
The aim of the present study was a comparison of the intraoperative sympathoadrenergic response and the postoperative vigilance of a propofol/alfentanil anaesthesia to a conventional isoflurane anaesthesia. 25 patients were admitted to the study undergoing septorhino surgery. Patients with continuous intravenous anaesthesia with propofol/alfentanil combined with nitrous oxide showed better haemodynamic conditions without an increase of blood pressure and catecholamines under laryngoscopy, intubation and surgical stimulation. In contrast to that the patients with isoflurane anesthesia showed a significant increase in haemodynamic parameters and capillary bloodflow. ⋯ Recovery was significantly faster and vigilance significantly better in the patients undergoing intravenous anaesthesia. After 30 min patients with i.v. anaesthesia fulfilled all the conditions to be transferred to the regular ward; the other group needed more than one hour. It can be concluded that continuous i.v. anaesthesia with propofol/alfentanil is superior in suppressing the stress response to invasive stimuli and provides faster recovery and better postoperative analgesia.