Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Oct 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPriming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of three colloids.
The present study was designed to compare the differences in the clinical effects of three colloidal solutions, albumin, urea-linked gelatin, and succinyl-linked gelatin, when used as priming fluids for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) under alpha-stat conditions. A consecutive series of 105 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were randomized into three identically managed groups, except for the CPB prime. Variables relating to acid-base status, oncotic activity, metabolism, coagulation, and postoperative evaluation were measured. ⋯ There were also no important intergroup differences in hematologic and clotting variables or postoperative parameters such as blood loss or use of blood products. Electrolyte changes were similar except for a significant increase in ionized calcium that occurred in the urea-linked gelatin group after bypass. The results indicate that succinyl-linked gelatin is an adequate and safe alternative to human albumin for use as a colloid during CPB under alpha-stat conditions.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialHemodynamic effects of muscle relaxant drugs during anesthetic induction in patients with mitral or aortic valvular heart disease.
The hemodynamic effects of three nondepolarizing skeletal muscle relaxant drug regimens were compared during the induction of general anesthesia in 64 patients with valvular heart disease using a double-blind protocol. Patients were first stratified according to primary valvular defect (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, or mitral regurgitation). Next, patients were randomly allocated to a drug group, either group A (atracurium), group V (vecuronium), or group MP (metocurine plus pancuronium). ⋯ Further analysis was performed using the following data: (1) other hemodynamic variables; (2) incidence of deviations from cardiovascular stability; and (3) the frequency of cardiovascular drug use. This examination showed no important differences among the muscle relaxant drug groups. The small but significant hemodynamic changes observed in mitral stenosis patients in drug groups A and MP were not noted with vecuronium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of cardiovascular effects of pipecuronium versus vecuronium in patients receiving sufentanil anesthesia for myocardial revascularization.
This study was designed to compare the cardiovascular effects of pipecuronium bromide (PIP) to vecuronium (V) when combined with sufentanil (SF) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eighty-two patients were studied; 40 were normotensive and 42 had hypertension currently controlled by pharmacological therapy. All patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous V, 0.12 mg/kg, or PIP, 0.10 mg/kg. ⋯ In addition, there were no statistical differences in the hemodynamic parameters measured at the five time points between the normotensive and hypertensive patient groups. This study demonstrates that there are no significant hemodynamic changes between SF/PIP and SF/V when used during coronary artery surgery. Due to its associated stable hemodynamics, as well as its long duration of action, PIP could become a commonly used muscle relaxant for anesthesia for cardiac surgery.