American heart journal
-
American heart journal · Nov 1994
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialInternational experience with secundum atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device.
Several devices are available for transcatheter occlusion of atrial septal defect. This report describes the international experience with the buttoned device. During a 4.5-year period ending in February 1993, 180 transcatheter atrial septal defect occlusions were performed with the buttoned device. ⋯ Color Doppler studies revealed either complete disappearance of the previously demonstrated shunts or further diminution of their size. The results indicate that transcatheter occlusion of the atrial septal defects with buttoned devices is feasible, relatively safe, and effective, and it appears to be a viable alternative to surgery for some patients with secundum atrial septal defect. Complications are infrequent and should improve with experience.
-
American heart journal · Aug 1994
Multicenter StudyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in 300 patients with coronary artery disease presenting exclusively with ventricular fibrillation.
To determine outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in a uniform population of survivors of sudden cardiac death, we used epicardial defibrillation lead systems to study 300 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting exclusively with ventricular fibrillation (VF) unassociated with acute myocardial infarction. Operative (30-day) mortality, 2.7% overall, was lower (0.6%) in patients with ejection fractions (EF) > or = 0.30. Over a median follow-up of 1.9 years, cumulative actuarial shock incidence was similar in patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (38%) and in those who did not. ⋯ The total mortality rate was similar in shocked and in unshocked patients. Multivariate analysis identified EF and female gender as significant predictors of any and appropriate shock occurrence (all p values < or = 0.05) and EF as a significant predictor of sudden, cardiac, and total mortality (all p values < 0.03). We conclude that in CAD patients presenting exclusively with VF unassociated with acute myocardial infarction and treated with thoracotomy-requiring ICD therapy: (1) operative (30-day) mortality is minimal for patients with an EF > or = 0.30; (2) device use is high and sudden death rates low regardless of concomitant CABG; (3) low EF is a significant predictor of cumulative shock occurrence and mortality (sudden, cardiac, and total); (4) female gender may be a predictor of shock occurrence; and (5) similar mortalities and low sudden-death rates in shocked and nonshocked ICD patients imply that ICD therapy improves survival in shocked patients to a level observed in comparable patients in whom ventricular tachyarrhythmia does not recur.
-
American heart journal · Apr 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialImplantable cardioverter defibrillator compared with antiarrhythmic drug treatment in cardiac arrest survivors (the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg).
In 1987, the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH), a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study, was started in survivors of sudden cardiac death resulting from documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Through December 1991, 230 survivors (46 women, 184 men; mean age 57 +/- 11 years) of cardiac arrest caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmias were randomly assigned to receive either oral propafenone (56 patients), amiodarone (56 patients), or metoprolol (59 patients) or to have an implantable defibrillator (59 patients) without concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. The primary endpoint of the study was total mortality. ⋯ This article presents preliminary results of the comparison of implantable defibrillator therapy with propafenone therapy. A significantly higher incidence of total mortality, sudden death (12%), and cardiac arrest recurrence or sudden death (23%) was found in the propafenone group compared with the implantable defibrillator-treated patients (0%, p < 0.05). It was concluded that, in survivors of cardiac arrest, propafenone treatment is less effective than implantable defibrillator treatment.
-
American heart journal · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialRelative importance of emergency medical system transport and the prehospital electrocardiogram on reducing hospital time delay to therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a preliminary report from the Cincinnati Heart Project.
Substantial time delays from symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction have been demonstrated. To determine the relative importance of prehospital mode of patient transport and the relative impact of emergency medical system transport with or without a prehospital cellular electrocardiogram (ECG) on hospital time delays to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, four prospective parallel groups of patients with acute myocardial infarction were evaluated. ⋯ Specialized emergency medical system transport alone did not facilitate in-hospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction when compared with those brought by local ambulance or by private automobile. A significant reduction in hospital time delay to treatment was observed only in patients transported by the emergency medical system who had cellular transmission of a prehospital 12-lead ECG from the field.
-
American heart journal · Jun 1991
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEffects of variable dose milrinone in patients with low cardiac output after cardiac surgery. European Multicenter Trial Group.
We studied 99 adult patients after elective cardiac surgery who had low cardiac output (cardiac index less than 2.5 L/min/m2) in spite of adequate cardiac filling pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure less than 8 mm Hg). Patients received milrinone by loading dose (50 micrograms/kg over a 10-minute period), followed by a continuous infusion of either 0.375, 0.5, or 0.75 micrograms/kg/min (low-, middle-, and high-dose groups, respectively) given for a minimum of 12 hours. Patients were allocated to each dosage group sequentially, not randomly. ⋯ Systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance also fell significantly, although changes in this latter parameter were less predictable and more dose dependent. Few serious treatment-related adverse effects were seen. We conclude that intravenous milrinone is an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of low output states after cardiac surgery.