Paediatric anaesthesia
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialOndansetron reduces nausea and vomiting after paediatric adenotonsillectomy.
The efficacy, safety and resource implications of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron (0.1 mg.kg-1, maximum 4 mg) were assessed in a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 427 children aged 1-12 years, undergoing tonsillectomy with/without adenoidectomy. Emesis (retching and/or vomiting) and nausea were analysed separately. Significantly more ondansetron-treated children had no episodes of emesis (127/212 (60%) vs 100/215 (47%); P = 0.004) and experienced no postoperative nausea (135/211 (64%) vs 108/213 (51%); P = 0.004) in the first 24 h. ⋯ Significantly fewer ondansetron-treated children were rescued or withdrawn from the study (5% vs 10%; P = 0.042). Fewer ondansetron-treated patients required nursing intervention (34% vs 45%; P = 0.007) and the average intervention time was significantly shorter (4.6 vs 8.1 minutes; P = 0.001). Resources used to manage PONV were significantly reduced by ondansetron (43% vs 57%; P = 0.014).
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol infusion vs thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia for prominent ear correction in children.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) frequently follows prominent ear correction under general anaesthesia in children. In a prospective, single-blind study, we compared the incidence of PONV after propofol infusion anaesthesia with that following thiopentone induction and isoflurane maintenance in 30 children aged from four to 14 years randomly allocated to one of two groups. All the children were mechanically ventilated. ⋯ One child receiving propofol (group P) complained of nausea, compared with eight receiving thiopentone/ isoflurane, (group T) (P = 0.005), while three children in group P and ten in group T vomited before hospital discharge, (P = 0.01). Eight children in group P were considered to be fit for discharge on the day of surgery as against four in group T, (not significant). Only four out of twelve children receiving opioid analgesia vomited.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia vs propofol infusion in children having repeat minor haematological procedures.
We have performed a randomized, cross over study in 22 children suffering from acute leukaemia, who underwent repeated anaesthesia for bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture. For their first anaesthetic, the children (aged 3-10 years old) received, either a thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthetic or intravenous propofol, both supplemented with nitrous oxide. On a second occasion they received the alternative technique. ⋯ Twenty-seven per cent had no preference. There was no significant difference in length of anaesthetic time (P = 0.07) or the time taken for recovery (P = 0.17) between the two groups. There was a large individual variation in propofol requirements and movement was common during stimulation of patients in this group, though this did not adversely affect the surgical procedure.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntranasal ketamine preinduction of paediatric outpatients.
A double-blinded, placebo-controlled study compared the outcomes of intranasal ketamine premedication with placebo in outpatients. Forty paediatric outpatients were assigned randomly in a prospective fashion to one of two separate study groups of equal size (20 patients per group). A placebo group received 2 ml of intranasal saline, 1 ml per naris. ⋯ Differences in age, weight, episodes of vomiting, recovery and discharge times among the two groups were not significant. Intranasal ketamine, 3 mg.kg-1, was associated with a significantly better (P = 0.013) cooperation index than intranasal placebo. Intranasal ketamine, permitted pleasant and rapid separation of children from their parents, cooperative acceptance of monitoring and of mask inhalation induction, and did not cause prolonged postanaesthetic recovery or delayed discharge home.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized controlled trial of sedation in the critically ill.
A randomized controlled trial comparing: a) a combination of oral chloral hydrate and promethazine to b) a continuous intravenous midazolam infusion, for maintenance sedation in critically ill children, was carried out. The level of sedation was assessed four hourly using a specifically devized sedation scale. Forty-four children entered the study of whom two were subsequently excluded. ⋯ The total number of satisfactory assessments in the two groups were only 61 and 48% respectively, suggesting that sedation can be considerably improved. Chloral hydrate and promethazine are more effective than midazolam as maintenance sedation in critically ill children. It is possible to prospectively study the efficacy of sedative drugs in critically ill children.