Surgical oncology clinics of North America
-
Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. · Jul 2001
ReviewThe immunologic consequences of laparoscopy in oncology.
The last decade has seen the publication of many studies regarding the impact of both traditional open methods and minimally invasive techniques on a variety of immune function parameters. Clearly, major surgery results in period of cell-mediated immunosuppression that can have an impact on the patient's recovery that would best be avoided. Although there are conflicting data among studies regarding some immune parameters there is general agreement in regards to other variables. ⋯ This work also has suggested novel means to avoid postoperative immunosuppression. Minimally invasive methods may be associated with oncologic advantages that go well beyond less pain, a quicker recovery, and a shorter length of stay. More basic science and human studies are needed to shed more light on this intriguing area.
-
Two types of procedure may be indicated in incurable patients. The first is palliative, in which the goal of intervention is relief of symptoms. ⋯ Procedures are categorized by the type of symptom the procedure is intended to relieve. This article emphasizes the principles involved in patient selection and outcome assessment in order to identify areas where more research is needed.
-
Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. · Jan 2001
ReviewPharmacologic management of nonpain symptoms in surgical patients.
Palliative care patients present with multiple symptoms other than pain and cachexia. Asthenia, delirium, dyspnea, and chronic nausea and constipation cause significant distress to patients and families and frequently coexist in the same patient. ⋯ The success rate is variable, and it is very high for symptoms such as chronic nausea or constipation and less effective for symptoms such as asthenia and delirium. More research on the mechanism and treatment of these symptoms is needed.
-
Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. · Jan 2001
ReviewPharmacologic management of pain: the surgeon's responsibility.
Historically, surgeons have had to witness their patients' pain probably longer than any specialty within medicine. Pain relief in palliative care forms the cornerstone of a comprehensive pattern of care that encompasses the physical, psychologic, social, and spiritual aspects of suffering. In a society that lives by mottoes, such as "no pain, no gain," and "just say no to drugs," pervasive subconscious barriers to effective pain relief exist. In being responsible for effective pain management to the patient, the surgeon must first set aside his or her own beliefs and attitudes regarding pain and its control and be open to change.
-
Because most cancer pain involves multiple anatomic sites, invasive techniques are intended to be analgesic adjuvants and not serve as the definitive treatment. These procedures often allow patients to reduce their dosages in their current drug regimens or to derive greater pain relief from their present doses in order to improve their quality of life. Medical care of the suffering pain patient requires a multimodality, multispecialty approach combining psychotherapy, social support, and pain management to provide the best possible quality of life or quality of dying.