European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Lumbar central spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common reasons for spine surgery in the elderly patient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the gold standard for the assessment of LSS and can be used to obtain quantitative measures of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) or qualitative measures (morphological grades A-D) of the rootlet/cerebrospinal fluid ratio. This study investigated the intercorrelation between these two MRI evaluation methods and explored their respective relationships with the patient baseline clinical status and outcome 12 months after surgery. ⋯ Postoperative outcome was clearly related to the degree of preoperative radiological LSS. The two MRI methods appeared to deliver similar information, as given by the relatively strong correlation between them and their comparable performance in relation to baseline and 12-month outcomes. However, the qualitative morphological grading can be performed in an instant, without measurement tools, and does not deliver less clinically useful information than the more complex and time-consuming measures; as such, it may represent the preferred method in the clinical routine for assessing the extent of radiological stenosis and the likelihood of a positive outcome after decompression.
-
The purpose of this study is to verify if any changes occur in pelvic incidence (PI) in adult patients undergoing long fusion to sacrum for spine deformity and to describe the effect of fixation to pelvis on these variations. ⋯ Older patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum without pelvic fixation had an increase in PI after surgery. Conversely, pelvic fixation with hips intraoperatively extended has decreased the value of PI from pre- to early postoperative. These changes could be related to degeneration of the sacroiliac joints causing increased rotational mobility and the magnitude of the differences is in the range of clinical relevance.