Cardiology in review
-
The Brugada syndrome is an inherited channelopathy that alters the main transmembrane ion currents that constitute the cardiac action potential. These changes not only modify the resting electrocardiogram but also predispose patients to develop malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias that can lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death. This syndrome is responsible for nearly 20% of all sudden cardiac deaths in patients with structurally normal hearts and up to 12% of all sudden cardiac deaths. ⋯ These changes can be observed spontaneously or after administration of a sodium channel blocker. While our understanding of this disease has increased tremendously since its first description in 1992, the primary therapeutic option remains implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to avoid sudden cardiac death. Therefore, tremendous effort is being made to effectively risk stratify patients to determine who would benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.
-
Cardiology in review · May 2019
ReviewEvolving Use of Biomarkers in the Management of Heart Failure.
Objective, noninvasive, clinical assessment of patients with heart failure can be made using biomarker measurements, including natriuretic peptides, cardiac troponins, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, and galectin-3. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with guidance on the use of heart failure biomarkers in clinical practice. The authors provide a didactic narrative based on current literature, an exemplary case study, and their clinical experience.
-
Cardiology in review · May 2019
ReviewAngiotensin II (Giapreza): A Distinct Mechanism for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.
Septic shock, a form of vasodilatory shock associated with high morbidity and mortality, requires early and effective therapy to improve patient outcomes. Current management of septic shock includes the use of intravenous fluids, catecholamines, and vasopressin for hemodynamic support to ensure adequate perfusion. Despite these interventions, hospital mortality rates are still greater than 40%. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality. Safety issues including the risk of thromboembolic events, infection, and delirium have made clinicians cautious in adopting angiotensin II into practice. Ongoing studies are needed to more clearly define the role of this agent and its utility in the management of shock.
-
Cardiology in review · Mar 2019
ReviewCardiac Immune-Related Adverse Events in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors present clinicians with both an exciting step forward in cancer treatment and the unknown possibilities of an unshackled immune system. The latter phenomena, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), are of particular interest because they may affect any organ system with autoimmune-like pathologies, such as hepatitis and colitis. Within the cardiovascular system, irAEs associated with immune checkpoint blockade exist as a broad clinical spectrum, with autoimmune myocarditis being the best-characterized entity at this time. ⋯ Yet, despite the potential severity such events pose, guidelines dictating the identification of immune checkpoint inhibition irAEs do not exist, providing a stark contrast with other anticancer medications with known cardiovascular effects. The lack of guidelines may be related to the perceived rarity of these events, yet a recent study of immune checkpoint inhibition-associated autoimmune myocarditis suggests that this clinical entity may be more prevalent than initially believed. Until more standardized information regarding these potentially serious events is available, the study of documented cases is instructive to improve identification of such phenomena, as well as the outcomes for patients who develop them.
-
The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have gained popularity recently among both patients and providers for their comparable or better efficacy and safety profiles compared with warfarin and the lack of need for routine monitoring of anticoagulant effect. One obstacle for the more widespread use of the DOACs in clinical practice has been the lack of a reversal agent. Most DOACs act by directly binding to and inhibiting the effects of factor Xa. ⋯ However, the occurrence of these adverse events needs to be considered in relation to the fragile nature of patients who receive this agent. Because the duration of the DOACs is much less than that of warfarin, it is unclear how many patients would actually need andexanet in clinical practice, because cessation of the DOAC may be all that is needed to effectively manage bleeding. Nonetheless, having andexanet available in cases of DOAC-associated severe or life-threatening bleeding represents a therapeutic advance and should provide an added level of comfort with the clinical use of DOACs.