Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Does an injection filter modify the cranial spread of a sensory blockade in epidural anesthesia?].
In a prospective study we compared the spread of sensory blockade in epidural anaesthesia with and without Micropore filter. ⋯ A total of 32 patients undergoing varicose vein stripping under epidural anaesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 each. Bupivacaine 0.75% and POR 8 (0.1 IU/ml) were administered by means of a constant-velocity perfusor. In group A a Micropore filter was inserted between the perfusor syringe and the epidural catheter. In group B the epidural catheter was connected to the syringe without the filter. The puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in a sitting position. An epidural catheter was advanced 3 cm cephalad. Using the pin-prick method, the sensory level of the blockade was tested 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min after injection of the local anesthetic solution. Statistical evaluation was performed with the t-test for unpaired samples. RESULTS. After 10 min the spread of analgesia was 5.75 +/- 1.26 segments in group A and 8 +/- 1.89 segments in group B; after 15 min it was 7.06 +/- 1.62 segments and 9.56 +/- 1.54 segments; after 20 min, 7.87 +/- 1.62 segments and 10.62 +/- 1.45 segments; and after 30 min 8.12 +/- 1.66 segments and 11.12 +/- 1.45 segments in group A and B, respectively. At any time sensory blockade was higher in group B (without Micropore filters) than in group A. The mean difference between the two groups amounted to 2-3 segments. The differences were significant at any time (P less than 0.001). These results show that the use of a Micropore filter in epidural anaesthesia leads to a reduced spread of sensory blockade. In our own examinations we found lowering of the pressure of the local anaesthetic solution that passes through the Micropore filter compared with the pressure of the solution injected without the filter. This seems to be the reason for the reduced spread of sensory blockade. Using these filters the onset of analgesia is delayed, and a given spread of analgesia needs a larger dose of local anaesthetic and is thus accompanied by a higher toxicity.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Post spinal headache. Its incidence following the median and paramedian techniques].
A lack of uniform methodology used by different authors in the assessment of different puncture techniques in spinal anesthesia formed the basis of the current study, which compared under randomized conditions the incidence of post spinal headache after a median or paramedian (lateral) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two hundred and fifty ASA physical status II and III patients, aged 50-85 years, scheduled for transurethral prostate surgery under spinal anesthesia were investigated. ⋯ The results indicate that the incidence of post spinal headache is higher in younger patients when using the paramedian (lateral) approach. However, our findings suggest that the choice of lumbar puncture technique--median or paramedian--is of little importance in regard to post-puncture headache in elderly patients. The paramedian approach is especially useful when degenerative changes are encountered in the interspinous structures in elderly patients, when an ideal position is difficult to achieve.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[The incidence of post spinal headache in a group of young patients].
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a significant and well-known complication of procedures that perforate the dura mater, e.g., clinical spinal anaesthesia (SpA). The exact mechanisms leading to PDPH are still not completely understood, although several factors, particularly the patient's age, modulate the incidence. In young patients (20-30 years) previous studies reported high occurrences of PDPH in 6%-16% of cases [5, 8], decreasing the value and acceptance of SpA in this patient group. ⋯ DISCUSSION. In contrast to previous studies reporting a high incidence of PDPH (6%-16%) in young adults, we found, in a stringent investigation of a large number of comparable patients in a defined age group, a PDPH rate of 3.5% and a few other minor side effects together with good anaesthetic quality, intraoperative stability, and excellent patient acceptance. Although future studies are needed to further minimise SpA complications, we found SpA a safe anaesthetic technique in our well-defined patient group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The accuracy of 4 different oximeters for continuous monitoring of mixed venous oxygen saturation during abdominal aortic surgery].
Several systems for mixed-venous oximetry are now available. There are one three-wave-length system (Abbott) and three two-wave-length systems with (Spectramed) and without automatic correction for hemoglobin or hematocrit (Edwards). The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the different systems and to examine the accuracy of continuous mixed-venous oximetry during abdominal aortic surgery. ⋯ Data sets were obtained at eight predetermined times. Hemoglobin was kept constant at +/- 1 g.dl-1. Continuous oximetry in comparison to in-vitro measurements yielded a correlation coefficient of r = 0.873 (P less than 0.0001) and a value of bias and precision (b +/- p) of -0.9 +/- 2.6% for the SAT-1, r = 0.815 (P less than or equal to 0.0001) and b +/- p = -2.2 +/- 2.5% for the SAT-2, r = 0.901 (P less than or equal to 0.0001) and b +/- p = 0.35 +/- 2.5% for the Hemopro2, and r = 0.920 (P less than or equal to 0.0001) and b +/- p = 0.1 +/- 1.8% for the Oximetrix 3, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Atropine in the premedication of patients at risk. Its effect on hemodynamics and salivation during intubation anesthesia using succinylcholine].
Should atropine be administered for premedication? This question continues to be controversial; in particular, the combined administration of atropine and succinylcholine has been investigated with conflicting results by numerous researchers. The present study was carried out to assess the effect of premedication with atropine on hemodynamic variables and salivation in patients assigned to ASA class II and III. METHODS. ⋯ No increase in heart rate occurred in the control groups during tracheal intubation. Neither i.m. nor i.v. atropine had any significant effect on blood pressure. Arrhythmias occurred in a few cases with both routes of administration; several instances of marked tachycardia were recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)