Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
Comparative Study
Positive-outcome bias: comparison of emergency medicine and general medicine literatures.
The existence of positive-outcome bias in the medical literature is well established. Positive-outcome bias in two emergency medicine journals was compared with that found in two general medicine journals. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the proportions of positive-outcome studies published in this sample of the emergency medicine literature compared with the general medicine literature. The potential impact of positive-outcome bias and methods of dealing with the problem are reviewed.
-
To determine whether previously developed triage criteria for refusal of care to patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) with nonurgent problems could be validated for an independent patient population. ⋯ The authors were unable to validate a previously developed predictive model for refusal of care to patients presenting to an ED. Refusal of care to selected ED patients based on current guidelines is not a viable solution to overcrowding. Alternative strategies must be sought.
-
To define risk factors for infections from dog- bite wounds and to model the probability of wound infection in patients presenting without infection who are treated as outpatients. ⋯ A low wound infection rate was seen in this cohort of dog-bite victims who were treated on an outpatient basis. Wound depth, patient gender, and wound debridement were the clinical variables that best predicted the likelihood of developing infection. Future interventional studies should concentrate on wounds with high probabilities of infection.
-
Editorial Comment
Triage of nonurgent patients out of the emergency department.