Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
Comparative Study
The validity of using multiple imputation for missing out-of-hospital data in a state trauma registry.
To assess 1) the agreement of multiply imputed out-of-hospital values previously missing in a state trauma registry compared with known ambulance values and 2) the potential impact of using multiple imputation versus a commonly used method for handling missing data (i.e., complete case analysis) in a typical multivariable injury analysis. ⋯ Multiply imputed out-of-hospital values for intubation attempt, Glasgow Coma Scale score, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate have fair to good agreement with known ambulance values. Multiple imputation also increased precision and reduced bias compared with complete case analysis in a typical multivariable injury model, and it should be considered for studies using out-of-hospital data from a trauma registry, particularly when substantial portions of data are missing.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation.
Use of ultrasound guidance for central line placement generally requires two operators: one to hold the transducer and the other to guide the needle. The authors propose a single-operator technique and compare it with the two-operator technique for placement of internal jugular central lines. ⋯ This one-person technique appears to be equivalent to the standard two-person technique for successful ultrasound-guided internal jugular central venous catheterization with respect to overall success.
-
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding threatens quality of care by delaying the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with time-sensitive diseases, such as acute stroke. ⋯ In the authors' institution, the presence of concurrent trauma evaluation does not delay CT imaging of patients with potential stroke.
-
To determine whether performance decrements at night actually translate into worsened measures of quality of patient care in the emergency department (ED). Emergency physicians and healthcare workers are sleepier and less cognitively proficient at night than during the day. Despite a lack of data, medical errors have been attributed to these deficits, and pharmacologic solutions recently have been suggested. ⋯ Quality indicators used in this study do not demonstrate marked deficits in patient care occurring at night. A very small, but measurable, increase in early mortality was identified. Improved measures to counter circadian disruption warrant study but may result in minimal improvements in patient care.
-
The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. ⋯ Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.