Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
In November 1996, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) enacted rules allowing a narrow exception to the requirement for prospective informed consent when enrolling critically ill patients in clinical research studies of emergency treatments. These rules require that, prior to initiation of the study, the applicable institutional review board (IRB) assess the acceptability of the proposed research study to members of the community in which the research will be conducted. Specifically, the IRB must perform community consultation-a process during which community members learn about the proposed research and communicate their opinions regarding its acceptability to investigators or IRB representatives. The FDA and DHHS rules do not define specific acceptable methods for performing this community consultation. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of one proposed method for performing such community consultation. ⋯ Community consultation regarding the acceptability of an emergency research protocol can be obtained via interview techniques in the ED. This methodology may allow investigators to obtain data on opinion from a targeted community for IRB consideration during the review of emergency research studies proposing a waiver of informed consent.
-
Editorial Comment Review
Changing clinical practice in geriatric emergency medicine.
-
Although the Internet has been described as "ubiquitous," little is known about the extent to which physicians have access to the Internet while providing clinical care. ⋯ Although half of Illinois EDs have PCs, only one in six has access to the Internet; thus, most emergency physicians do not have ready access to the Web from the site where they deliver clinical care.
-
Comparative Study
Effects of a pneumonia clinical pathway on time to antibiotic treatment, length of stay, and mortality.
A clinical pathway standardizing management for patients with an admission diagnosis of pneumonia was initiated after a previous study found delayed time to initial antibiotic administration, a longer length of stay, and higher mortality rate for the authors' patients as compared with those in a "benchmark" hospital. The current study was undertaken to determine whether implementation of the clinical pathway resulted in statistically significant decreases for these measures, both in the initial year following pathway implementation and two years later. ⋯ This study demonstrates that implementation of a pneumonia clinical pathway for the management of hospitalized patients admitted via the ED decreases the time to initial antibiotic treatment and increases the proportion of patients initially treated with antibiotics in the ED. These effects were evident in the first year following pathway implementation and sustained at the three-year study interval.