Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
To determine the value of paramedic judgment in determining the need for trauma team activation (TA) for pediatric blunt trauma patients. ⋯ Results of this investigation indicate that a small percentage of pediatric blunt trauma patients require TTA. EMT-P judgment alone of the need for TTA for pediatric blunt trauma patients is not sufficiently sensitive to be of clinical use. The low sensitivity is explained by the deterioration in the clinical condition of 2 initially stable patients. The paramedic disposition decisions from the scene were always accurate. Nontransport by emergency medical services (EMS) may be acceptable in some uninjured pediatric trauma patients. Injured pediatric trauma patients who appear to be stable may deteriorate shortly after injury. However, if a pediatric patient appears injured, transport from the scene and examination by a trauma specialist are needed. Finally, the role of paramedic judgment must be further defined by larger studies with urban, rural, and suburban EMS systems before it can be used as a sole predictor of TTA.
-
To determine the minimal clinically significant difference (MCSD) on a visual analog patient satisfaction scale. ⋯ The MCSD in patient satisfaction scores measured with a 100-mm VAS was approximately 7-11 mm. Future studies evaluating differences in patient satisfaction should be designed to detect this difference.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of demand-valve and bag-valve ventilations in a swine pneumothorax model.
Two means of delivering artificial ventilation readily available to out-of-hospital personnel are the bag-valve (BV) and the O2-powered demand-valve (OPDV). However, use of the OPDV has been limited because of concerns that it may worsen an underlying pneumothorax. This study compared the changes in size of pneumothorax in swine ventilated with the 2 devices. ⋯ There is no difference in final pneumothorax volumes after OPDV or BV ventilation.
-
To determine the etiology of new-onset generalized seizures in patients with AIDS presenting to an ED. Patients without HIV infection with a first-time seizure were used as a comparison group. With these data, the current American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) guidelines on the workup of new-onset seizures were applied to determine whether they could safely be used in patients with AIDS. ⋯ Four of 26 AIDS patients with immediately treatable CNS lesions could have been sent home for outpatient evaluation of their seizures on the basis of current guidelines for non-HIV-infected patients. However, the updated 1997 ACEP guidelines now include emergent brain neuroimaging studies on patients who have or are suspected of having AIDS. This study helps to strengthen this recommendation. Based on these findings, the authors suggest a neuroimaging study with a lumbar puncture, if indicated, in the ED or inpatient admission workup for all patients with AIDS or suspected AIDS presenting with new-onset generalized seizures.
-
To evaluate the concordance with criteria developed by the study investigators and supply costs associated with placement of i.v. lines and saline locks by paramedics in the out-of-hospital setting. ⋯ Based on study criteria for utilization of i.v. lines vs SLs in the field, paramedics and base hospital personnel often provide discordant-overtreatment of patients by placement of an i.v. when a SL or No i.v. would suffice, resulting in unnecessary costs for EMS systems.