Shock : molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobiological aspects and therapeutic approaches : the official journal the Shock Society, the European Shock Society, the Brazilian Shock Society, the International Federation of Shock Societies
-
Purpose: This study is designed to explore the role and mechanism of circ_0099188 in LPS-engendered HPAEpiC cells. Methods: Circ_0099188, microRNA-1236-3p (miR-1236-3p), and high mobility group box 3 (HMGB3) levels were measured using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cell viability and apoptosis were assessed using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometry assays. ⋯ Also, the downregulation of circ_0099188 might overturn LPS-triggered HPAEpiC cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammatory response. Mechanically, circ_0099188 is able to affect HMGB3 expression by sponging miR-1236-3p. Conclusion: Circ_0099188 knockdown might mitigate LPS-induced HPAEpiC cell injury by targeting the miR-1236-3p/HMGB3 axis, providing an underlying therapeutic strategy for pneumonia treatment.
-
Background: Immunosuppression caused by immune cell apoptosis and an imbalance of T helper 2 cells (T H 2) and T helper 1 cells (T H 1), is associated with poor outcomes in septic patients. Esmolol was reported to improve survival by modulating immune responses in septic shock. Whether esmolol could alleviate sepsis-induced immunosuppression and the optimal dose are unclear. ⋯ Conclusions: Low dose of esmolol reduced T-lymphocyte apoptosis and restored T H 2/T H 1 ratio in septic shock. Esmolol might modulate Akt/Bcl-2/Caspase-3 pathway to relieve T-lymphocyte apoptosis and inhibit Erk1/2 activity to decrease T H 0 differentiation to T H 2. Esmolol may be a potential immunoregulator of septic shock.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Evaluation of Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The HYVITS Trial).
Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of combined hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine (triple therapy) on the mortality of patients with septic shock. Methods : This multicenter, open-label, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted in four intensive care units in Qatar. Adult patients diagnosed with septic shock requiring norepinephrine at a rate of ≥0.1 μg/kg/min for ≥6 h were randomized to a triple therapy group or a control group. ⋯ Conclusion: Triple therapy did not improve in-hospital mortality at 60 days in critically ill patients with septic shock or reduce the vasopressor duration or SOFA score at 72 h. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03380507. Registered on December 21, 2017.
-
Objective: Based on the functions of immunoregulation and signal transduction, septic peripheral blood sequencing and bioinformatics technology were used to screen potential core targets. Methods: Peripheral blood of 23 patients with sepsis and 10 normal volunteers underwent RNA-seq processing within 24 hours after admission to the hospital. Data quality control and differential gene screening were performed based on R language ( P < 0.01; log2FC ≥ 2). ⋯ Conclusions: CD160, KLRG1, S1PR5, and RGS16 were mainly located in human peripheral blood NK-T cells. Sepsis participants expressed lower levels of S1PR5, CD160, and KLRG1, while sepsis participants expressed higher levels of RGS16. This suggests that they may be potential research targets for sepsis.
-
Multicenter Study
OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ZONE 3 AND ZONE 1 AORTIC OCCLUSION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BLUNT PELVIC INJURIES.
Background: A 2021 report of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery multicenter registry described the outcomes of patients treated with Zone 3 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA zone 3). Our study builds upon that report, testing the hypothesis that REBOA zone 3 is associated with better outcomes than REBOA Zone 1 in the immediate treatment of severe, blunt pelvic injuries. Methods: We included adults who underwent aortic occlusion (AO) via REBOA zone 1 or REBOA Zone 3 in the emergency department for severe, blunt pelvic injuries [Abbreviated Injury Score ≥ 3 or pelvic packing/embolization/first 24 hours] in institutions with >10 REBOAs. ⋯ These patients did not differ in systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prehospital/hospital settings, SBP at the start of AO, time to AO start, likelihood of achieving hemodynamic stability or requirement of a second AO. After controlling for confounders, compared with REBOA Zone 3, REBOA Zone 1 was associated with a significantly higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.19), but there were no differences in VFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.33-1.31), IFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.39-1.57), discharge GCS (adjusted difference, -1.16; 95% CI, -4.2 to 1.90) or discharge GOS (adjusted difference, -0.67; 95% CI -1.9 to 0.63). Conclusions: This study suggests that compared with REBOA Zone 1, REBOA Zone 3 provides superior survival and is not inferior regarding other adverse outcomes in patients with severe blunt pelvic injuries.