Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di nefrologia
-
Severe sepsis and septic shock are still associated with high mortality rates. To improve the outcome, multidisciplinary interactions and cooperation between basic, clinical and industrial researchers are mandatory to develop new artificial or biological devices for the treatment of septic syndrome and related systemic complications. In the future, the development and validation of new biomarkers, aimed at an early diagnosis of sepsis, and the rigorous monitoring of the most significant prognostic indicators, could contribute to better understanding of the mechanisms underlying septic syndrome as well as to the timely institution of potentially effective treatments.
-
The so-called systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS ) represents the cellular inflammatory and neuroendocrine systemic reaction in response to many adverse events. epsis is defined as IR induced by bacterial, mycotic or viral toxins. The circulating toxins deriving from the bacterial wall can activate the septic cascade that induces many systemic reactions involving the activation of the cellular immunity, complement and coagulation system. The endothelial cell is the target of the systemic phlogistic reaction; its stimulation is followed by the production of many vasoactive paracrine and systemic agents. ⋯ The combination of acute renal failure and sepsis is associated with a high mortality rate, namely in patients with a nitric oxide-induced systemic reduction in peripheral vascular resistances and septic shock. The toxinemia can also induce myocardial damage with a reduction in cardiac performance. Therefore, septic patients who have a combination of pulmonary, cardio-vascular, renal and cerebral lesions present with the picture of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, that can increase mor-tality to > 0%.
-
Several techniques are currently available in the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) spectrum, adhering to different clinical conditions and illness severity. Commercially available machines have become more user-friendly, even for non-dialysis staff however, nephrologists need specific knowledge to give an adequate prescription that must be different from chronic hemodialysis. Competence and experience in the technical possibilities of CRRT lead to an individual ultra-filtration and treatment dose prescription. ⋯ In septic patients standard CRRT has no specific indications in the absence of acute renal failure. Other extracorporeal therapies, such as high volume hemofiltration coupled with plasma filtration-adsorption (CPFA), have been developed aiming for a major influence on sepsis evolution. The versatility of CRRT has great value not only in adapting the treatment schedule to clinical conditions, but also in performing extracorporeal therapies in a wide array of logistical circumstances.
-
Renal replacement therapies (RRT) are a key component of the therapeutic approach to acute renal failure (ARF) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and they are usually performed as classic Intermittent (intermittent hemodialysis) or continuous RRT (such as for example continuous venovenous hemofiltration, CVVH). No clear evidence exists on what the first-choice RRT option should be for ICU patients with ARF. Alternative strategies have been developed, under the form of intermittent prolonged RRT, with the aim of providing easy to perform, highly efficient, and less expensive RRT in the ICU. In this review we put forward the hypothesis that hybrid RRT, such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis ( sLED), could offer a valuable alternative to the currently available strategies in the critically ill with ARF.
-
The medical treatment of intensive care unit patients represents one of the greatest costs in the health care system. Patients affected by acute renal failure account for about -10% of cases: dialysis treatment is of major importance in an economical setting. ⋯ Moreover, a higher dialysis dose, easily obtained with CRRT, could improve survival and renal function recovery leading to a reduction in hospitalization and consequently minor health care costs. These parameters, if opportunely evaluated and verified through randomized multicentric trials, could lead to an economical balance between CRRT and IHD; nephrologists, then, could choose a method out of medical and clinical more than economic reasons.