Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Laparoscopic surgery remains the mainstay of treating foregut pathologies. Several studies have shown improved outcomes with the robotic approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs (HHR) and Heller myotomy (HM) repairs is needed. ⋯ Laparoscopic and robotic HHR and HM repairs have similar safety profiles and perioperative outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare the two methods, given the low to moderate quality of included studies.
-
Esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is challenging and carries risk. The value of esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is not well-defined. ⋯ In cT4 esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophagectomy is associated with improved rates of 5-year OS compared to non-surgical treatment.
-
Outcomes of Colectomy and Proctectomy According to Surgeon Training: General vs Colorectal Surgeons.
Colectomies and proctectomies are commonly performed by both general surgeons (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS). The aim of our study was to examine the outcomes of elective colectomy, urgent colectomy, and elective proctectomy according to surgeon training. ⋯ In this nationwide study, colectomies and proctectomies performed by CRS were associated with improved outcomes compared to GS. Hospitals without a CRS on staff should consider prioritizing recruiting CRS specialists.