Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Comparative Study
Does Performance Vary Within the Same Hospital When Separately Examining Different Patient Subgroups?
Surgical quality programs, such as the American College of Surgeons NSQIP, provide reports based on specialty or procedure, with patients aggregated together. It is unknown whether hospital performance differs by patient subgroup (eg cancer vs noncancer patients), masking opportunities for improvement. Our objectives were to determine whether performance differs within a given hospital for 6 contrasting patient subgroups and to identify the percentage of hospitals with greater than chance differences in performance. ⋯ Hospital performance within a given hospital varies by patient subgroup. Quality programs can consider separate reports for these subgroups to identify opportunities for quality improvement.
-
The benefits of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remain controversial in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of pCND with a large group of cN0 PTC patients. ⋯ Given the lack of proven benefits and the clear evidence of morbidities, pCND cannot be recommended as a routine procedure. We suggest that CND be reserved for therapeutic situations.
-
Traumatic injury remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a large economic burden. One fourth of annual Medicare expenditures result from readmissions, including trauma. The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) has elevated care for >200 trauma programs worldwide. We use ACS TQIP, which does not include 30-day outcomes featured in the ACS NSQIP, affecting observed readmission rates. ⋯ We hypothesized that our observed and actual readmission rates differed. We discovered a significant difference in reported rates. Incorporating an NSQIP-like postdischarge feedback process can improve the accuracy of hospitals' readmission data and complication reporting, and thereby improve the value of the information TQIP uses as benchmarks.
-
Comparative Study
Measuring Surgical Site Infections in Children: Comparing Clinical, Electronic, and Administrative Data.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an important end point and measure of quality of care. Surgical site infections can be identified using clinical registries, electronic surveillance, and administrative claims data. This study compared measurements of SSIs using these 3 different methods and estimated their implication for health care costs. ⋯ There is poor correlation among SSIs measured using electronic surveillance, administrative claims, and clinically derived measures of SSI in the pediatric surgical population. Although these measures might be more convenient, clinically derived data, such as NSQIP Pediatric, may provide a more appropriate quality metric to estimate the postoperative burden of SSIs in children.
-
Observational Study
Surgical Management and Outcomes of Combined Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries: Analysis of 75 Consecutive Cases.
Combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries (CPDI) are complex and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Survival in CPDI after initial damage-control laparotomy (DCL) and pancreaticoduodenectomy was evaluated in a large cohort treated in a Level I trauma center. We hypothesized that bivariate analyses would accurately identify factors influencing morbidity and mortality. ⋯ Despite using DCL in CPDIs, morbidity (84%) and mortality (28%) remain substantial. Careful selection of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy resulted in 84% survival. Associated vascular injuries, major visceral venous injuries, and combined vascular and associated organs injured influenced outcomes and mortality.