Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research
-
Ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 5 (UBR5) has been identified as an oncogene in diverse cancers; however, whether its expression was associated with radiosensitivities of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells remains unclear. Expression levels of UBR5 in NSCLC tissues and cell lines were examined by immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. Colony formation assay, CCK-8 cell viability assay, flow cytometry, and caspase-3 activity assay were performed to evaluate the radiosensitization of UBR5 knockdown in NSCLC cells, and the underlying mechanism in vitro was also investigated. ⋯ UBR5 inhibition enhanced the radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells by inhibiting the cell viability and inducing apoptosis. Further investigation indicated that UBR5 knockdown-mediated radiosensitization involved the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway. Knockdown of UBR5 radiosensitizes NSCLC cells via the inactivation of the PI3K/AKT signal, which provided a novel therapeutic target for NSCLC radiosensitization.
-
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected over 114 million people and has resulted in >2.5 million deaths so far. Some people have greater susceptibility which influences both SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and COVID-19 severity. Smoking is associated with increased ACE-2, the receptor for SARS-CoV-2, which facilitates its entry through the lung. ⋯ Lung ACE-2 expression was increased in male mice in a nicotine-dependent manner as compared with female mice. Collectively, while vaping (±nicotine) induced airway inflammation and impaired lung function, the induction of lung ACE-2 occurred to a significantly greater degree in males exposed to vapor containing nicotine as compared with females. Thus, via these effects on ACE-2 expression in the lungs and airways, vaping itself may facilitate SARS-CoV-2 entry into the airways.
-
Clinical research is a discipline prone to the use of technical terms that may be particularly at risk for misunderstanding given the complex interpretation that is required. In this century, what is happening with the word 'pragmatic' when describing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with medicines deserves a public reflection. Explanatory trials are conducted in ideal conditions to assess the comparative efficacy of interventions and are useful to explain whether interventions work. ⋯ Those involved in clinical trials should emphasize the importance of precision in the use of terms when describing RCTs through standardized solutions when possible. Unless clinical trial stakeholders agree when it would be correct to label an RCT as pragmatic, in a short period of time the term will be in danger of becoming meaningless. It is suggested that the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) network, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) could address this topic and provide a consensus way forward.