Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2023
ReviewCardiogenic shock: a major challenge for the clinical trialist.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) results in persistently high short-term mortality and a lack of evidence-based therapies. Several trials of novel interventions have failed to show an improvement in clinical outcomes despite promising preclinical and physiologic principles. In this review, we highlight the challenges of CS trials and provide suggestions for the optimization and harmonization of their design. ⋯ Accurate characterization of CS severity and its pathophysiology are crucial to unravel heterogeneity and identify the patients most likely to benefit from a tested treatment. Implementation of biomarker-stratified adaptive clinical trial designs (i.e., biomarker or subphenotype-based therapy) might provide important insights into treatment effects.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2023
ReviewInsulin resistance in critical illness: consequences for nutrition therapy and glucose management.
Critically ill patients usually develop insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, which is aggravated by early parenteral nutrition. In observational studies, the lowest mortality risk associates with glucose concentrations close to the antecedent average glucose level. This review summarizes the most recent evidence regarding glucose control in critical illness. ⋯ It remains unclear whether tight glucose control in critical illness is beneficial or not in the absence of early parenteral nutrition, which is currently being studied in the multicenter TGC-fast randomized controlled trial. Without new evidence, it seems prudent to avoid severe hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in all patients.
-
There is emerging evidence on the role of the multimodality imaging in the setting of cardiogenic shock. The utility of different imaging modalities, along with their pitfalls and limitations, and their integration in a multiparametric approach are discussed in the current review. ⋯ Although validation of the integrated approaches and single parameters are needed, the physiopathological-driven approach using ultrasound in patients with cardiogenic shock on top of the clinical and biochemical evaluation, may aid to a quicker and more detailed evaluation of patient's phenotype.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2023
ReviewThe changing face of cardiogenic shock: definitions, epidemiology, and severity assessment.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) has been recognized for >50 years, most commonly in the setting of myocardial infarction. This review covers recent advances in the definitions, epidemiology and severity assessment of cardiogenic shock. ⋯ Cardiogenic shock mortality has not changed in a significant way in many years. Recent advances such as more granular assessment of shock severity have the potential to improve outcomes by allowing research to separate the patient groups which may respond differently to various therapies.