Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2005
ReviewThe applications of B-type natriuretic peptide measurement in the intensive care unit.
Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels are used to screen for cardiac dysfunction in the emergency department and outpatient population. However, in the critically ill patient elevated plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels do not necessarily reflect just ventricular dysfunction, as there are important confounding factors to consider. This review summarizes the recent advances in the application of B-type natriuretic peptide measurement in the intensive care unit. ⋯ B-Type natriuretic peptide is potentially a very useful diagnostic tool in the intensive care unit. To date there have been few studies and the results are often contradictory, mainly due to the special setting of the intensive care unit, which is constantly exposed to hemodynamically unstable patients, different case mixes as well as vigorous treatments. All of these are potential confounders to B-type natriuretic peptide levels and make interpretations of B-type natriuretic peptide difficult. We need more research on these confounding factors to accentuate the positive value of B-type natriuretic peptide in the intensive care unit.
-
Vasoactive drugs are the mainstay of hemodynamic management of vasodilatory shock when fluids fail to restore tissue perfusion. In this review, studies published during the past year that increase our understanding of the use of vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit are discussed. ⋯ Over the last 40 years, there have been few controlled clinical trials to guide clinicians on the use of vasoactive drugs of treating shock states. It is not known whether the currently favored combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine is superior to traditional therapy with dopamine. Epinephrine is not recommended as the first-line therapy. The role of vasopressin and terlipressin remains unknown. Three large ongoing clinical trials will be completed soon and the results should clarify the role of these various agents.
-
There is considerable evidence that dysregulation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems plays a major role in the pathophysiology of severe sepsis, with a special focus on the protein C system. Conversely, there is an approval for use of recombinant human activated protein C in the more severe patients. This review highlights recent findings about the biology of the protein C system and of other important coagulation components such as tissue factor, platelets, and protein S, with an effort to link fundamental data and recent clinical findings. ⋯ The comprehension of the protein C pathway is undoubtedly progressing both in experimental and clinical settings. In parallel, some promising other coagulant pathways are also under investigation in the sepsis context, with a hope for major clinical implications in the future.
-
The purpose of this review is to indicate recent developments in biomarkers of sepsis and to evaluate their impact on clinical use. According to the 'surviving sepsis campaign,' diagnosis of sepsis and infection is urgent; early and specific treatment is most effective to reduce complications and to decrease mortality. ⋯ Recent data and cumulative analyses indicate that biomarkers of sepsis improve diagnosis of sepsis. However, only a few markers have impact on therapy and fulfill the clinical requirements. Procalcitonin is a well-established marker, indicating infection, sepsis, and progression to the more severe stages of the disease. Today, this biomarker should be in the diagnostic portfolio of an intensive care unit or emergency ward.
-
The underlying pathophysiology of sepsis has long been disputed. Systemic vasodilatation is important in the development of shock and, in septic critically ill adults who have been volume resuscitated, the systemic pressure is often low and the cardiac output high. In septic children however, and especially in those with meningococcal septic shock, poor cardiac output as a consequence of depressed myocardial function seems to be important, often being the cause of death in these patients. There is much evidence for disturbance of myocardial performance, yet despite the literature, there is still no consensus on how best to manage this complication of meningococcal disease. ⋯ Accepting that myocardial dysfunction may be an important cause of the shock state in overwhelming meningococcal disease, the approach to management may need to be tailored appropriately. Although presently there is no targeted treatment, it may be that therapy focused on inhibiting or antagonising interleukin-6 will be helpful in the future. Regardless of the importance of myocardial depression, fluid resuscitation remains a cornerstone in the management of severe meningococcal disease.