Current opinion in critical care
-
Basic life support and rapid defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia are the only two interventions that have been shown unequivocally to improve survival after cardiac arrest. Several drugs are advocated to treat cardiac arrest, but despite very encouraging animal data, no drug has been reliably proven to increase survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest. This review focuses on recent experimental and clinical data concerning the use of vasopressin, amiodarone, magnesium, and fibrinolytics during advanced life support (ALS). ⋯ Fibrinolytics are likely to be beneficial when cardiac arrest is associated with plaque rupture and fresh coronary thrombus or massive pulmonary embolism. Fibrinolysis may also improve cerebral microcirculatory perfusion once a spontaneous circulation has been restored. A planned, prospective, randomized trial may help to define the role of fibrinolysis during out-of-hospital CPR.
-
Controversy concerning the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and its use as a bedside clinical tool continues to be a significant bone of contention. In the pursuit of evidence-based medicine, a substantial effort has been made over the last 25 years to demonstrate the benefit or lack thereof of PAC-led therapy, and this endeavor still persists with large, randomized, clinical trials currently in progress both in the United States and in the United Kingdom. This article reviews the core evidence for and against PAC efficacy and safety and considers the most appropriate method for validation of such a device.
-
Recently there has been much interest in the use of hypothermia in the management of the brain-injured patient and its effect on outcome. Most of these studies examine the use of hypothermia compared with normothermia of 37 degrees C and have failed to demonstrate a benefit in the treatment groups, but what is normothermia in the brain-injured patient? Good epidemiologic evidence suggests that the vast majority of patients admitted to an ICU environment will develop a fever. ⋯ Several treatment options for controlling temperature are discussed. Despite a sound physiologic argument for controlling fever in the brain-injured patient, there is no evidence that doing so will improve outcome.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Apr 2002
ReviewTherapeutic approaches to vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Delayed vasospasm as a result of subarachnoid blood after rupture of a cerebral aneurysm is a major complication. It is seen in over half of patients and causes symptomatic ischemia in about one third. ⋯ The mainstays of treatment are careful maintenance of fluid balance, induced hypervolemia and hypertension, calcium antagonists, balloon or chemical angioplasty, and, in some centers, cisternal fibrinolytic drugs. Promising future lines of treatment include gene therapy, nitric oxide donors, magnesium, sustained release cisternal drugs, and several other drugs that are under experimental or clinical trial.